Orange County NC Website
<br />He identified several of the major changes in the Ordinance: <br />1. Animal Control Director - it is recommended that the animal <br />control program for Orange County be placed under an animal <br />control director who has a background and training in animal _.,...~ <br />control issues. <br />2. Domesticated Livestock - the Ordinance addresses some of the <br />concerns expressed by the cattlemen in the County. <br />3. .Licensing and Registration - a differential licensing fee <br />schedule is recommended in the Ordinance. <br />4. Control of animals - the Ordinance encourages throughout <br />responsible pet ownership. <br />5. Restraint of animals - standards for the length of a leash and <br />standards for insuring the proper humane treatment of animals <br />is included in the Ordinance. <br />6. Steel Leghold Traps -the Ordinance bans the use of steel jaw <br />traps but does provide for ~a permit under certain <br />circumstances. Concerns about humans and pet animals being <br />caught in the traps were addressed. <br />7. Standards are set out in the Ordinance for various classes of <br />institutes which house animals. <br />8. Penalties for violators of the Ordinance are .listed. The <br />Animal Control Officer will. be given some responsibility for <br />enforcing the provisions of the Ordinance. <br />In answer to a question from Planning Board Member Chris Best, Mr. <br />Ingram clarified that the ordinance sets out standards for the resale of <br />animals and does not address the problem of dognaping. <br />Planning Board member Peter Kramer asked if there is a provision for.~~=, <br />the compensation of livestock if killed. Mr. Ingram reported there is a <br />provision in the State Statutes which states that the owner of livestock <br />whose stock is damaged by another animal can through civil action file for'` <br />compensation. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPEN FOR CITIZEN'S COMMENTS <br />WAYNE WIGGINS spoke in opposition to the Ordinance stating there is na <br />need for the ordinance in the County and ask that the Ordinance be put to <br />a vote of the people. <br />EMILY WEINSTE2N spoke in support of the ban of the leghold trap <br />stating that it is cruel and should be banned throughout the world. It <br />causes extreme pain for the wild animals and also for domestic .animals. It <br />is barbaric and should be banned. <br />BILL BREEZE made reference to Section 4 and expressed opposition to <br />this section. He stated that Section 11 which requires dogs to be tied <br />in the back of pickup trucks is not necessary. If a dog is restrained he <br />will try to get lose and get hurt. This restriction should not be placed <br />on the citizens of Orange County. The impact of this section needs to be <br />reviewed. He stated he lost several thousand dollars worth of timber <br />because of the beavers. The fox population has increased over the years. <br />He uses traps and stated they do not hurt animals if the traps are <br />monitored regularly. The Ordinance is a good start but the impact needs <br />to be determined before approval. <br />GILBERT PETTY spoke in opposition of the ban of the leghold traps. He <br />spoke about depredation of livestock and the overpopulation of racoons, <br />muskrats, and the beavers. The beavers dam up the water and flood the <br />