Minutes - 19870519 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

i --, - ~i - 8. SAN-REBA WOODS ~ PRELIMINARY PLAN Rick Prince, attorney for San-Reba Woods, indicated that the problems as identified in a letter from Mike Brough have been worked out. Greg Szymik presented for consideration of approval the Prelimi- _- nary Plan for San-Reba Woods. The property fronts on Craig Road in Eno Township and is split by the Orange-Durham County line. Thirty-five lots are proposed out of 5o acres. The property is zoned A-R and designated Agricultural Residential in the Land Use Plan. Durham County has given approval of the lots located in that County. The Planning Board recommended approval with five (5) conditions. Rick Prance, in response to a request from Mike Brough, requested that a sixth condition be added as a requirement for approval. Mike Brough's office indicated agreement with this condition. Motion was made by Commissioner Halkiotis, seconded by Commissioner Carey to approve the Preliminary Plan with the following six conditions: (].) Submittal and approval by the County Attorney of a maintenance agreement for the recreation site and facilities. (2) Lots 3, 22, 34 and 35 must be combined with another lot or be labeled as being of restricted development potential as required by Section III-E-5-e of the Subdivision Regulations. (3) Roads must.be named. (4) The phasing line between phases II & III must be moved to include the pedestrian easement in phase II. (5) Provision of a landscape plan demonstrating compliance with. section IV-B-B, including location of existing trees, land use buffers, and areas to be planted. (6) Upon final approval of phase l that the road that runs through phase 2 and phase 3 a~.so be approved. At the time ,,,,;;~ of recording of the final plat of phase 1, then that phase 1 ~- plat should include dedication not only of the phase 1 streets but also dedication of phase 2 and phase 3 streets. This is based on the further condition that it not be necessary to build the phase 2 or phase 3 road or to post a bond to guarantee the building of that road until the plat that places a -.record of lots in phase 2 and phase 3 are ,actually recorded. The posting of the bond for phases 2 and 3 will be waived until the final plat is recorded. VOTE: UNANIMOUS. 9. POLICY - APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS TO SECTION IV-B- 8 OF SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS Greg Szymik presented .for consideration of approval a policy for applying landscape requirements to subdivision applications that were in process when the new standards went into effect. On March 24, the Board of County Commissioners approved amendments to Section IV-B-8, Landscaping and Buffer Requirements, of the Subdivision Regulations. Enforcement of Section IV-B-8-c-1 was suspended by a moratorium passed by the Cammissioners on December 1, 1986. This moratorium was no longer valid when the amendments were adopted. The Planning Board recommended approval of the fol~.owing policy and the Manager concurs with this recommendation: (1) In the case of major subdivision, preliminary plan approval was obtained between December 1, 1985 and March 24, 1987. (2) Tn the case of minor subdivision, sketch plan approval was obtained between December 1, 1986 and March 24, 1987. The County Attorney recommended that the Ordinance amendments be effective December 1, 1986, less the landscaping requirements, and that