Orange County NC Website
/~ - - <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Carey, seconded by Commissianery <br />Hartwell to instruct County members of the working intergovernmental group <br />to not consider, as a part of their deliberations, disenfranchisement of <br />county citizens through placing them in extra-territorial jurisdiction but <br />will emphasize and encourage intergovernmental cooperation to achieve <br />planning goals. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS. <br />Commissioner Willhoit suggested that a more formal mechanism be <br />put in place to inform each other on the Board of the various happenings <br />on the different groups that each represent and Commiss~.oner Halkiotis <br />suggested that this be reviewed after the budget process is finished. <br />2. JOINT PLANNING AREA LAND USE PLAN <br />1 EXPANSION OF TRANSITION AREA <br />(2) BOUNDARY DESIGNATION -_TRANSITI.ON AREALRURAL BUFFER <br />;~3) ORANGE COUNTY-CARRBORO ZONING. JURISDICTION BOUNDARY <br />Planning Board Chair Barry Jacobs presented the Planning Board <br />recommendation as stated below in the motion for approval. <br />Judith Wegner, member of the Carrboro Board, stated that there is a <br />consensus on the Carrboro Board that the swap idea should not be pursued. <br />The Board agrees with the representation suggestion and she stated that <br />the legislation submitted provides far that representation. If the <br />Planning Board recommendation is adopted, the. Carrboro Board will. review <br />and provide additional comments if necessary. She emphasized that <br />continued dialogue is very important. <br />Commissioner Willhoit referred to the two designations to be <br />established for Duke Forest. He questioned the rationale for indicating <br />that those properties abutting Duke Forest will be kept out of the <br />transition area and placed as part of the Rural Buffer. As part of the <br />Land Use Plan this property would have a buffer as it was developed. <br />_.: Collins indicated that the buffer would be a condition placed upon any <br />of the land developed along the Duke Forest line. <br />Don Epling, Associate University Counselor at Duke, stated that they <br />are in the process of studying the purposes and goals for the use of Duke <br />Forest land. He indicated that Duke does not object to any particular <br />land use plan presented to date. The study will take into account haw <br />development may impact and how that fits in. <br />Mr. Pope spoke on behalf of one of the landowners who owns 90 acres of <br />land south of Duke Forest. He referred to a statement made in the Planning <br />Board minutes which talked about the densities not being consistent with <br />the Duke Forest recommendations. <br />Commissioner Hartwell questioned the land use designation for the <br />future landfill site and Collins indicated that it is property that is not <br />zoned for a land use or a landfill but is a potential landfill site. <br />Before the property could be used as a landfill a special use permit would <br />have to be approved by the Commissioners. .Commissioner Hartwell then <br />requested that the status of the property be more clearly shown on County <br />planning .maps shown to the public. <br />Motion was made by Commissioner Hartwell, seconded by Commissioner <br />Carey to approved the Planning Board recommendation as stated below: <br />(1) Approval of the Transition Area extension into the full. extent of the <br />Bolin Creek basin except in Duke Forest and for those properties abutting <br />Duke Forest, and that two designations of Transition Area be established - <br />Transition I and II. Area I would include that area previously designated <br />for urban expansion. Area II would include the extended area. <br />