Minutes - 19870223 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

_M.r. David Lanese stated he is a Calvander resident and opposes the land swap. He noted that everyone who spoke has been in favor of protection of the watershed. He indicated also that he could understand that Carrboro has a legitimate interest in expanding. He expressed the feeling that there is a lack of a principal argument in favor of the swap itself. He noted that the linkage between these two propositions does not depend on any principled argument advanced thus far by anyone. He noted that the linkage seemed to be grounded in political expediency, and he submitted that this is insufficient to justify the swap which is proposed. He asked for a reasonable affirmative base for the swap rather than palitical expediency. Ms. Helene Ivey encouraged watershed protection and suggested a County-wide bond issue to buy land necessary for watershed protection. Mr. Larry „Reid expressed concern with the location of this public hearing in view of the fact that the majority of the citizens affected would be nearer Chapel Hill High School as a meeting place. He spoke in favor of joint planning but strongly opposed the proposed land swap. He inquired why the County could not maintain extraterritorial jurisdiction over the area and give Carrboro the right of courtesy review. He noted that the swap would create "taxation without representation". He indicated he felt the swap goes against the Joint Planning Agreement. Mr. Skip Mendler stated that the watershed needed to preserved at all costs. •He expressed the concern that Carrboro has no direction in which to grow. He felt that Calvander, Carrboro. and all the surrounding areas have interdependent relationships. that must be preserved. Future focus-the need to plan far ahead-is a fact. Perhaps it is not true that Large urban development will continue to occur. He encouraged communi ration and cooperation far joint planning affects everyone, not just .~alvander and Carrboro. Ma or James Porto of Carrboro reminded those present that Carrboro residents are citizens of Orange County and that between Carrboro and Chapel Hill, they make up two-thirds of the citizens of Orange County which is near 45,000 people. This fact needs to be remembered when one speaks of representation. He stated that his Soard endorses the 13 point plan. Mayor Porto continued, stating that Carrboro's growth strategy over the years has not been one of unbridled growth. He noted that Carrboro recognizes they cannot develop very intensely, in the watershed, but they can develop there at a price. He noted that Carrboro was the first jurisdiction in the State to have a watershed ordinance of such magnitude. He noted that Carrboro had downzoned the watershed area to about what the County is trying to achieve for the rural buffer area. He indicated Carrboro's watershed ordinance is a model ordinance for many other jurisdictions. He stated that if Carrboro is to remain a viable community in the future (40 to 50 years from now) it must have a direction in which it can grow .logically, orderly and not rapidly or rampantly; the only available area is to the north. He indicated that the only way to assure that one's land is not sold or developed in later years by decendants is public dedication. He felt this is a fact. In referring to the land swap and statements from the public regarding annexation, Mayor Porto stated that Carrboro could not annex for six years unless it is a voluntary annexation. He noted also that there are certain density requirements which must be met for annexation that cannot be met by Calvander. Thus, it does not mean annexation will take