Minutes - 19870223 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

could be in the acre-for-acre swap, while another 200 acres would be in the proposed transition area. She continued, noting that her family is very interested in protecting the watershed. She indicated two purposes would be served if the swap takes place-the watershed would be protected and Carrboro would be given the license to grow but there is no sense of equity for those residents of the Calvander area. She urged the Commissioners not to diminish the way of life of the Calvander residents forever. Mr. Henry_Whitfield indicated he did not own property in the area being considered for the swap. He expressed a concern over public confusion and lack of knowledge in the general public about planning. He expressed concerns that County planners were not aware of the impact of their planning efforts on the property owners/taxpayers of the County. He indicated he felt there would be a two-acre checkerboard over the entire county. He noted concerns that he felt planning was being done without the property owners having benefit of input. He indicated he felt pressure would not be so great on planners if there were only one planning office for the whole of Orange County. Chair Marshall asked Mr. Whitfield to please speak only to the issues on the public hearing agenda. Mr. Whitfield indicated he felt he was speaking to the transition area on the agenda. He expressed concern that he was not able to, present his problem, indicating he felt the meetings were not properly set so all property owners could participate before decisions were made. He suggested that the entire County be under one planning jurisdiction and the problem of jurisdiction would be solved. Mr. David Moreau spoke in favor of the concept of the 13 point plan in so far as it offers development in the Bolin Creek Watershed as a alternative to development in the University Lake Watershed. He noted that growth is occurring at a very rapid rate and the consequence of this is the transition of lands from lower to higher densities. He indicated the proposal represents a logical step to accommodate growth while minimizing the adverse effects of growth and minimize the cost of providing sewer service. He indicated that wherever growth occurs, the problem of what to do about areas that are undergoing transition from lower to higher densities is an ongoing question. He indicated he felt that in addressing those issues it is appropriate that one consider the welfare of the larger community. in the County and minimize the impacts of growth on ever-gone. Mr. Jay Bryan stated he is a resident of Carrboro and noted he could sympathize with the current government's need to try to reach .out for some more property. He did not feel it is appropriate to use the method of swap to do this. He felt that if the Amberly project is approved, it will set a precedent that the County will not be able to overcome. Tt will allow development to come in and affect. adjoining property values and cause land value to be reduced as density is increased. He felt any project proposed for the watershed should be kept under a moratorium until the watershed study is completed. He expressed the desire that oWASA take a mare protective stance in terms of being the real advocate for water. Mr. Dan Okun encouraged water management. He noted that development will be taking place but asked that it not be allowed to take place in the watershed. University Lake Watershed is not only supplying water for Chapel Hill but will be a water supply for the entire southeastern region of Orange County. The only way to protect the watershed is to prevent development in the watershed. He urged that a good example be set as a portion of Chatham County is also in the University Lake watershed.