Orange County NC Website
one unit per five acres are in effect, Carrboro's plans would allow fo~~- <br />densities much higher than that. Allowing higher densities in the <br />transition area north of Carrboro can only increase development pressure on <br />the watershed. He urged the County not to approve extension of the extra <br />__._territorial jurisdiction north of Carrboro. <br />Mrs. Margaret Holton presented a statement, a copy of which is filed <br />in the permanent agenda located in the Clerk's office. <br />Mr. sa Zara oza expressed concern that the 13 point plan was not a <br />land use plan but wasteful thinking. He urged the County to devise a plan <br />for sewer lines. He stated he felt if the governing bodies could get a <br />grip on where the sewer and water lines will go, you will have a grip on <br />land use planning over the County. <br />Mr. Everette Billingsley. Executive Director of OWASA presented a <br />statement, a copy of which is filed in the permanent agenda in the Clerk's <br />Office. <br />Mr. Warren L. Ganona presented a statement, a copy of which is filed <br />in the permanent agenda in the Clerk's Office. <br />Ms. Kathy Harris presented a statement, a copy of which is filed in <br />the permanent agenda in the Clerk's Office. <br />Mr. Pearson Stewart noted that he had conflicting ideas in his mind <br />concerning the future of the Calvander/Homestead Road area east of the <br />University Lake Watershed. He stated that he is very supportive of the <br />residents goal to keep the Calvander/Homestead Road area as rural and very <br />low density. Consequently, he strongly supports the concept of joint <br />~~lanning for the area south of Duke Forest. He noted that there was a big <br />iifference between the Bolin Creek Watershed and the University Lake <br />;`;~~':_~::~atershed. The University Lake watershed is very inappropriate for <br />development and the Bolin Creek Watershed is very appropriate for <br />development. He expressed support for the extension of the <br />extraterritorial jurisdiction and the placing of University Lake Watershed <br />under County jurisdiction. He did note that these were two conflicting <br />concepts concerning the future of the Calvander/Homestead Road but each is <br />realistic and realizable. <br />Mr. Michael Hartlev , a Bingham Township. resident, indicated. there <br />are two watersheds in Bingham Township-Cane Creek and Collins Creek. The <br />treatment of these two watersheds is very different. The water supply from <br />Bingham which goes to Chapel Hill is substantially protected. The Collins <br />Creek drainage which lies between Cane Creek and University Lake watersheds <br />is used by Chapel Hill and receives a substantial amount of sewage from the <br />treatment plants of Chapel Hill in the form of treated sludges which are <br />applied to the lands in the Collins Creek basin. He indicated he felt any <br />statement of what was acceptable in one drainage basin but not another is <br />premature. He felt that the Collins Creek basin should also be included in <br />any study of watersheds. He strongly opposed the concept of trading off an <br />unprotected watershed for the protection of another. We indicated the need <br />to look beyond reservoirs to groundwater and to that body of the public <br />who do not consume water which is piped in but draws it untreated through <br />private wells. <br />Ms. Jean Earnhardt a resident of Calvander, stated that her family <br />awns 400 acres of land north of Calvander on Union Grove Church Road. She <br />agreed with Mr. Pinney that there is not a trend for selling and developing <br />land in the Calvander community. She noted that about loo of these acres <br />