Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-21-1998 - 10b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1998
>
Agenda - 04-21-1998
>
Agenda - 04-21-1998 - 10b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2013 3:21:05 PM
Creation date
7/15/2010 3:25:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/21/1998
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
10b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19980421
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AANC <br />M <br />Apartment Association of North Carolina <br />Representing the Multi - Family Housing Industry in North Carolina <br />January 23, 1998 <br />Mr. John Link <br />Orange County Manager <br />P.O. Box 8181 <br />Hillsborough, NC 27278 <br />Re: Orange County School Impact Fees <br />Dear Mr. Link <br />PS/ �J "09- V <br />Our Association continues to have a keen interest in having a conversation with yourself, Orange <br />County Attorney Jeff Gledhill, and the Orange County Board of County Commissioners on the <br />subject of the calculation of Orange County school impact fees. We contend that the imposition of <br />these fees on multi-family rental housing, which is a readily identifiable class of properties that by <br />its very nature houses fewer children than single - family housing and thus has demonstrably less of <br />an impact on educational facility costs, is inequitably high and very possibly illegal. Please see the <br />attached letter written to Mr. Gledhill on September 30, 1997. <br />The North Carolina Court of Appeals, in a 1989 case, adopted the "rational nexus" test requiring <br />exactions to be properly and fairly related to the need for new public facilities generated by a new <br />development. In our view, apartment developers have, since 1993, paid and are continuing to pay <br />school impact fees in your county which are substantially beyond that portion of the cost which is <br />reasonably attributable to the needs created by new apartment construction. <br />Our Association commissioned an independent University of North Carolina study on this subject <br />last year. We have shared all of the findings with Mr. Gledhill, and Mr. Collins and Mr. Bell of the <br />Planning Department. UNC's Dr. Emil Malizia wrote, "Charging impact fees on apartment units at <br />half the fee charged to single - family or less would be more consistent with the actual impacts on <br />public schools. Furthermore, the impact fee would be far less regressive as a result ". We note that <br />the consultant for neighboring Chatham County states that the maximum supportable impact fees <br />per housing unit are $3,529 for single - family and $1,164 for multi- family. <br />Units of government have a duty to achieve the highest possible level of equity in attempting to <br />recover actual costs, or in forecasting future cost recovery. I will phone you next week for your <br />reaction to this letter and for your advice on how to best proceed. Thank you. <br />Sincerely, <br />Kenneth N. Szymanski, AICP <br />Executive Director <br />cc Mr. Jeff Gledhill <br />711 Fast Morehead St. • Suite 201 • Charlotte, North Carolina 28202.7043349511 • FAX 704 - 333 -4221 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.