Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-21-1998 - 10b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1998
>
Agenda - 04-21-1998
>
Agenda - 04-21-1998 - 10b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2013 3:21:05 PM
Creation date
7/15/2010 3:25:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/21/1998
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
10b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19980421
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
13 <br />May 1, 1997 <br />Prepared by: Emil E. Malizia <br />AANC Report: <br />The Impacts of Recent Residential Development on-Public <br />Schools in North Carolina Urban Areas: Single - Family Housing <br />Compared to Apartments <br />Background <br />In May 1996, the Principal Investigator (PI) completed a <br />survey of the academic literature and trade publications <br />pertaining to development impact fees for the Apartment <br />Association of North Carolina (AANC). The specific concern <br />was to identify empirical estimates of development impacts <br />by housing type -- apartments compared to single - family <br />residences. The review supported the idea that apartments <br />generally have lesser impacts compared to single - family <br />housing primarily because the former have fewer persons per <br />household and fewer children per household. <br />Survey Work <br />In September 1996, the PI agreed to conduct a random sample <br />survey of housing units in the five urban areas of North <br />Carolina — Asheville, Charlotte, Piedmont Triad (Greensboro <br />and Winston - Salem), Research Triangle (Raleigh, Durham, Cary <br />and Chapel Hill), and Wilmington. The survey was designed to <br />estimate the differences between the household <br />characteristics of apartment dwellers compared to the <br />occupants of single- family housing. The sample size was <br />supposed to be large enough to generalize the results to all <br />metropolitan areas of North Carolina. <br />The survey was specifically intended to determine the number <br />of children being sent to public schools by households <br />living in recently built apartments and single - family <br />dwellings. The questions pertained to household size; <br />number, age and grade level of children; public, private or <br />home schooling; tenure of the household in the dwelling, <br />county, urban area or state; and housing size, value and <br />age. Exhibit 1 is the survey questionnaire. <br />In October 1996, staff at the Center for Urban and Regional <br />Studies conducted a telephone survey of 630 households in <br />the five North Carolina urban area's in order to generate the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.