Browse
Search
Minutes - 19861124
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Minutes - 19861124
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2013 3:41:27 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:49:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/24/1986
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
307 <br />Collins indicated this item is to receive public comment on a <br />proposed Zoning Ordinance text amendment which would establish <br />dimensional requirements such as lot area, lot width, setbacks, building <br />height, etc. for a proposed new zoning district classification, Rural <br />Buffer (RB). <br />Collins indicated that the information regarding lot sizes in the <br />agenda packet was based on 80,000 square foot lots and should be <br />disregarded. He said updated information was distributed based on a two <br />acre lot size before the meeting. Collins said data was collected from <br />the Orange County Land Records Office indicates that approximately.50~ of <br />the parcels within the proposed Rural Buffer have lot sizes of less than <br />2 -acres. This indicates that 50~ of all parcels within the area would <br />become nonconforming if the proposed minimum lot size. standard of two <br />acres were adopted. These parcels constitute only five percent (5~) of <br />the total acreage. Other dimensional requirements that would apply <br />include lot width, front, side and rear setbacks, building height and <br />standards which apply to Planned Developments. The minimum lot width <br />proposed. in the RB district would be 200 feet. The proposed front yard <br />setback would be 60 feet from the front property line. The proposed side <br />and rear yard setbacks would require a 30-foot setback. The proposed <br />maximum building height is 25 feet. For Planned Developments, the <br />minimum gross land area required would be 4 acres. A maximum floor area <br />ratio of .04 is proposed and the minimum required open space (a11 areas <br />not covered by buildings) would be 86~ of the site. The required <br />livability space ratio would be 80$. The minimum required recreational <br />space ratio on a lot-by-lot development would be equivalent to .014. <br />He explained that for any type of multi-family development or non- <br />residential development, the same minimum lot size would apply. The <br />dimensional requirements for non residential use are identical to those <br />for residential development in this Rural Buffer area. <br />Collins emphasized that any existing one acre lot that existed prior <br />to the time of the adoption of this Ordinance could be built upon <br />provided the owner of that lot did not own other lots with continuous <br />frontage. If a person owns more than three lots, the continuous frontage <br />rule would apply. There are provisions that would allow three lots with <br />80~ of the lot area and 80$ of the lot width required in the Rural Suffer <br />district. <br />If any structure within this proposed Rural Buffer became <br />nonconforming. as a result of the application and was destroyed up to 75~, <br />of the floor area, it could be reconstructed and would not need to meet <br />the minimum lot size or minimum width standards. It would have to comply <br />with front, side and rear yard setback requirements as well as the <br />building height requirements. <br />3. SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS AMENDMENTS <br />a. Section IV-B-1 Lot Standards <br />To clarify the application of lot standards within the Orange <br />County Subdivision Regulations, it is recommended that the following <br />wording for the first sentence in the first paragraph of Section IV-B-1 <br />read as follows: <br />"The minimum lot size shall be as required by the Orange County <br />Land Use Plan, Orange County Zoning Ordinance or the Hillsborough Zoning <br />ordinance, whichever is applicable." <br />Collins noted for the record the receipt of several letters. <br />Those writing in support of the 2 acre minimum lot size are Mr. William <br />Mead, Mr. Dale Hammond, and R. R. McGregor Converse. Those writing in <br />opposition of the 2 acre minimum lot size are Mazie Cradle, Surtronics, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.