Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-06-1998 - 9h
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1998
>
Agenda - 05-06-1998
>
Agenda - 05-06-1998 - 9h
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2010 3:46:43 PM
Creation date
7/14/2010 3:46:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/6/1998
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9h
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19980506
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br />Proposal <br />As a matter of explanation, space for the regular probation and parole officers (PPO's) is <br />the responsibility of the County, while housing for the intensive probation officers is the <br />responsibility of the State. Although different parties meet the Division's space <br />requirements, their responsibilties and activities are alike. If one explores the function of <br />the organization (not PPO's vs. intensive teams), it becomes evident that the function <br />operates more effectively when both sections are housed together. <br />In keeping with this concept, the Probation and Parole Supervisor of District 156 has <br />expressed a desire to consolidate the function into one location. Throughout the Justice <br />Facilities Study Group, the County has expressed an interest in seeing more efficient <br />operations of the courts. This would appear to be a good example. <br />In response to the ever-increasing space needs of the court system and to facilitate <br />greater efficiency in service delivery for the affected court agencies, the following <br />proposal is offered: <br />- The Public Defender would be relocated to Carr Mill Mall in the space previously <br />occupied by the Health Clinic; <br />• County cost of modifications requested by the Public Defender to make the <br />space a law office rather than a health clinic would be approximately $13,000. <br />This does not include the cost of carpet replacement and painting walls, which is <br />the responsibility of the Landlord. The necessary funds were included in the <br />1997-98 general fund allocation for the Courts. <br />• The lease amount for the space used by the Public Defender is anticipated to be <br />approximately $41,000. This includes all utilities, cleaning and maintenance. <br />- The Guardian Ad Litem program would expand into one additional office in the <br />Moody Building. <br />- The regular Probation and Parole office (our responsibility) would expand into areas <br />vacated by the Public Defender and Housing and Community Development in the <br />Moody Building. <br />- The County would allow the intensive probation team (State responsibility) to locate <br />in the Moody Building as well. The State will pay rent in an amount of $23,994 per <br />year for the space. This lease amount would include utilities, cleaning and <br />maintenance for which the County is responsible under the Moody Building lease. A <br />floor plan indicating the proposed areas for lease are attached. Renewal terms for <br />the Moody Building are cited on a separate abstract regarding the lease renewal for <br />that building. <br />A lease cost summary is as follows: <br />- Total Carr Mill rent costs (including Dental) $ 86,757 <br />- Total Moody Building rent costs 41.040 <br />- Total $ 127,797 <br />- Less State lease amount 17 922 <br />- Net cost of rent to the County $ 109,875 <br />Terms of the Carr Mill renewal as recommended are: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.