Browse
Search
Minutes - 19861013
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1986
>
Minutes - 19861013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 12:21:23 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:49:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/13/1986
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
amendments thereto, as well as approval for development <br />applications in the rural buffer. Mr. Thompson stated the <br />proposal called for Chapel Hill to recommend zoning <br />classifications for the transition area and that the County <br />would grant approval of the zoning based on Chapel Hill's <br />recommendations to Orange County for development applications <br />in the rural buffer areas. He said the agreement would be a <br />two party agreement between Chapel Hill would also make <br />recommendations to Orange County for development applications <br />in the rural buffer areas. He said the agreement would be a <br />two. party agreement between Chapel Hill and Orange County and <br />would supercede the existing joint planning agreement upon its <br />adoption. <br />Council Member Howes expressed concern that the proposal <br />eliminated Chapel Hill from the development of a land use plan <br />For the joint planning area, feeling this elimination in effect <br />did away with the theory of joint planning. He said he <br />understood the reasoning for having Chapel Hill have sole <br />approval/denial of development applications in the transition <br />areas as a means of eliminating duplication of efforts both for <br />developers and the staff, however, he felt the Town should have <br />approval authority of the joint land use plan. <br />Council Member Andresen expressed concern about the County <br />having sole zoning authority of the transition area. County <br />Manager Thompson responded that the County would probably adopt <br />the recommendations made by the Chapel Hill Town Council for <br />the zoning of the transition area as long as the proposed <br />.zoning designations were consistent with the adopted land use <br />plan. <br />Council Member Godschalk agreed with Council Member Howes that <br />the Town should retain its approval authority of the joint land <br />use plan even though the bulk of this plan had already been <br />decided. <br />Commissioner Marshall commented that the County should not <br />initiate any rezoning request in the transition area without <br />the Town's knowledge and approval. <br />Council Member Smith said the joint agreement should include <br />language to that affect. <br />Council Member Howes asked about the legality of having the <br />Town grant approval/denial of development requests within the <br />transition area. County Attorney Gledhill replied that in <br />agreement, Orange county would delegate the approval authority <br />to the Chapel Hill Town Council. He said appeals would follow <br />the normal channels in that the appeal would be made to the <br />Superior Court. <br />Manager Taylor stated that as he understood from the discussion <br />the staff should prepare a proposal that would give joint <br />approval of the joint land use plan and any amendments; joint <br />approval of zoning designations for the transition area; and <br />recommendatory authority for developments in the transition <br />area to Orange County and in the rural buffer to Chapel Hill. <br />284c <br />Chair Willhoit suggested that two representatives from the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.