Orange County NC Website
37 <br />M E M O R A N D U M <br />Orange County Planning & Inspections Department <br />306F Revere Road Hillsborough, NC 27278 <br />Telephone: (919) 732 -8181 <br />E -mail: dbelk @co.orange.nc.us <br />FAX (919) 644 -3002 <br />To: Rod Visser, Assistant County Manager <br />From: Donald R. Belk, Planner II/Preservation <br />Date: May 12, 1998 <br />Subject: Summary on Cost of Community Services (COCS) Studies <br />Copies: John Link, County Manager <br />Gene Bell, Acting Planning Director <br />At the BOCC meeting of May 6, Dolly Hunter, chair of the Agricultural Districts Advisory Board, stated <br />that a comparison of the costs and benefits of farmland preservation versus the provision of county <br />services to developed land is essential for public support of a PACE program. A number of studies, <br />known as cost of community services (COCS) studies, have been completed in several places where <br />farmland preservation is an important issue. These studies consistently show that farmland preservation <br />pays for itself in the long run. Since its need for services is low compared to residential development, <br />preserved farmland has a positive impact on tax revenues, generating more in taxes than it demands in <br />public services. <br />Attached is a summary from the Farmland Information Library I that briefly describes the methodology, <br />function, and purpose of a COCS study. In 1994, an abbreviated analysis of COCS in Orange County <br />was prepared for the "Green Book ". This cursory examination used the fiscal impact analysis template <br />developed by the Planning Department to examine the effects of converting a 125 -acre farm to 58 <br />residential lots. This abbreviated analysis showed that for every dollar of tax revenue raised by this <br />development, Orange County spent an extra $0.34 in direct services (1 : 1.34). For the 125 acre farm, the <br />ratio was 1 : 0.61; e.g., for every dollar of tax revenue raised by the farm, only $0.61 in expenditures was <br />required for services - a net gain of $0.39. <br />While these results should not be construed as equivalent to the detailed COCS studies conducted at <br />other locations, they may serve to verify other findings that farmland preservation is indeed a fiscally <br />responsible endeavor. <br />/db <br />attachment <br />1 The Farmland Information Library is a part of the Farmland Information Center: a project of American Farmland Trust Center for <br />Agriculture in the Environment; funded by USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service in affiliation with the USDA National <br />Agricultural Library. <br />