Orange County NC Website
ORANGE COUNTY <br />BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br />Adion Agenda <br />Item No. ~~ <br />ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br />Meeting Date: June 22, 1998 <br />SUBJECT: Fixed Asset Capitalization Policy <br />DEPARTMENT: PURCHASING AND Public Hearing: No <br />CENTRAL SERVICES Budget Amendment Reqd? No <br />ATTACHMENT(S): <br />Proposed policy <br />INFORMATION CONTACT: <br />Ken Chavious, ext 2450 <br />Pam Jones, ext. 2650 <br />Telephone Number- <br />Hillsborough 732-8181 <br />Chapel Hill 967-9251 <br />Mebane 227-2031 <br />Durham 688-7331 <br />PURPOSE: To consider adoption of a policy regarding the valuation of fixed assets for <br />accounting purposes. <br />BACKGROUND: Both the Local Govemment Commission (LGC) and the Govemment Finance <br />Officer's Association (GFOA) recommend that governmental entities have formal policies in <br />place to provide accountability for fixed assets. It is further recommended that the governing <br />body formally adopt such policies. <br />The current policy capitalizes all items which have a useful life of one year or more and cost in <br />excess of $500. This policy has not been formally adopted by the Board. Based on <br />recommendations from the County's auditors and a survey of Counties of similar financial <br />resources, a change in the capitalization policy is recommended. The policy recommended to <br />the Board capitalizes all assets which exceed one year of useful life AND whose cost exceeds <br />$1,000 in purchase price OR has a serial number. Both the current and the proposed policy <br />track all data processing equipment regardless of cost. <br />As referenced earlier, this change is in some respeds promulgated by comments made by the <br />auditor's during the 1996-97 audit. The auditors recommended that we °Gean up' our fixed asset <br />reporting by increasing our level of value. This recommendation was not considered an audit <br />exception or finding, only a policy consideration. In reviewing our fixed assets the auditor cited <br />many items of immaterial value which could be removed to provide a more efficient means for <br />accountability. <br />In accordance with this, the Purchasing Department has been effeding additions and deletions to <br />the current asset system commensurate to the proposed policy. Staff felt that this revamping of <br />the fixed assets should include formal Board adoption of a fixed asset policy as recommended <br />by the LGC and GFOA. It is proposed that the policy be retroadive to July 1, 1997 in oMer to <br />have the change refleded in the 1997-98 audit. <br />RECOMMENDATION: The Manager recommends that the Board adopt the Fixed Assets <br />Capitalization Policy with an effedive date of July 1, 1997. <br />