Orange County NC Website
ORANGE COUNTY <br />BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br />Action Agenda <br />Item No. 9-,E' <br />ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br />Meeting Date: June 22, 1998 <br />SUBJECT: Disposition of Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools Property <br />DEPARTMENT: Manager's Office <br />PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) <br />BUDGET AMENDMENT: (Y/N) Nii'r` ~- <br />ATTACHMENT(S): <br />5/21/98 CHCCS Attorney Letter to BOCC <br />3/25/98 CHCCS Attorney Memo <br />NCGS § 115C-518 <br />INFORMATION CONTACT: <br />Rod Visser, Assistant County Manager <br />TELEPHONE NUMBERS: - -ext. 2300 <br />Hillsborough 732-8181 <br />Chapel Hill 968-4501 <br />Durham 688-7331 <br />Mebane 227-2031 <br />PURPOSE: To consider an offer from the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Board of Education for the <br />County to acquire real property no longer needed for school purposes. <br />BACKGROUND: The Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools (CHCCS) own a 738 square foot house <br />in Jackson, Mississippi valued at $25,580. CHCCS have determined that the property is no longer <br />needed for school purposes and would like to dispose of it. North Carolina law requires the board <br />of education to first offer the property to Orange County "at a fair market price or at a price <br />negotiated between the two boards". If the Orange County Commissioners decline to acquire the <br />property, CHCCS would be free to dispose of the property in accordance with the provisions <br />outlined in NCGS § 115C-518. <br />The Manager, Attorney, and staff have discussed the pros and cons of accepting this site. There is <br />no ready use to which the property could be put in furtherance of the Board of Commissioners' <br />goals and policies. If the property were obtained at a nominal price, the County could presumably <br />sell it and receive the proceeds as general revenue (note that the offer from CHCCS does not state a <br />proposed sale price). However, if the property were to be acquired from CHCCS at or near its <br />stated market value, there would likely be no financial gain (and perhaps a financial loss) to the <br />County from a subsequent resale of the property. Additionally, the acquisition of the property <br />would require staff and attorney time to handle all legal and administrative procedures associated <br />with obtaining the property from the school system, and then presumably the subsequent iesale of <br />the property. The County has no independent assessment of the quality of the property, its <br />marketability, or any liabilities/liens/restrictions that may be involved with this property. <br />RECOMMENDATION(S): As the Board decides. <br />