Orange County NC Website
D <br />June 8, 1998; the respective municipal resolutions are attachments to these <br />minutes on pages .Z2 --�.5- This item will be presented to the Board of <br />Commissioners at the September 1, 1998 meeting. <br />The Planning Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment to <br />the Joint Planning Agreement. <br />Strayhorn asked about the affect on minor subdivisions. Bell responded <br />that minor subdivisions (5 lots or less) would not be included in the <br />moratorium. <br />McAdams asked if all three jurisdictions have to approve the moratorium <br />for it to be in effect. Using a map, Bell indicated the areas affected which <br />are the Chapel Hill Transition Area, Carrboro Transition Area and the Rural <br />Buffer in Orange County. He noted that Chapel Hill could place a <br />moratorium on its Transition Areas, Carrboro on its Transition Areas and <br />Orange County on the Rural Buffer. <br />Selkirk asked about the administrative process among the three <br />jurisdictions for solving problems during the moratorium. Bell responded <br />that the amendment has been proposed to address situations where changes <br />are in progress such as the Carrboro Small Area Plan. It would set a cutoff <br />date until the plan and implementing ordinances are through the process so <br />that developers and/or landowners are not caught in the middle of that <br />process. <br />Barrows asked whether there had been a moratorium in this area in the <br />recent past. Bell responded that there is no provision in the current Joint <br />Planning Agreement for a moratorium. He continued that there has been <br />one in the Carrboro Small Area Plan area which was a case in which the <br />Carrboro Board of Aldermen voted to enact one and Orange County did not <br />object if Carrboro wanted an extension to get through the planning and <br />ordinance writing process. This amendment would establish definite <br />guidelines for a moratorium. <br />Woods asked the rationale for the exception for minor subdivisions. Bell <br />responded that minor subdivisions are handled administratively in the office <br />in Orange County. The applicant works one -on -one with Planning Staff, <br />Register of Deeds, Land Records and County Attorney to meet <br />requirements. The largest minor subdivision is five lots. On an average, <br />minor subdivisions in Orange County are two lots. It is also a matter of <br />impact; a minor subdivision of one or two lots as opposed to a major <br />subdivision of fifteen to twenty lots (average size of a major subdivision in <br />Orange County). <br />Strayhorn stated that he felt it was very important to continue to allow <br />minor subdivisions. He felt that there are times when the allowance of a <br />minor subdivision prevents a major subdivision of a large tract of land. <br />MOTION: Brooks moved approval as recommended by the Planning Staff. Seconded <br />by Selkirk. <br />VOTE: Unanimous. <br />