Minutes - 19850930 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

UUU~34 building codes following submittal for and issuance of building permits. 10. A final boundary survey of the Planned Development and improvenets shall be recorded by the developer. 11. The final site plan and narrative of the project, incorporating all changes, deletions and additions through the final approval of the project, are to be incorporated herein and made a part of this Planned Development Special T3se Permit. Copies of the final site plan and narrative are to retrain on file with the Orange County Planning Aepartment. Grading and building permits, upon application, will be issued after approval and recordation of the Special Use Permit. 12. The development shall be built and operated according to the site plan and written narrative supplied by the developer and in compliance with the above coalitions. VOTE: UNAN.Q'1QUS. ~. ~s~ _ snrr~A~ ~r~r., ~~ . rya U~ PLAN ~ ~ c~AT.ID7aER COT7CRETE C(~1PANY (Public Hearing for receipt of the Recammerr7ation from the Planning Board) Planner Gene Hell presented for consideration a proposed secondary amerx~nent to the Iand Use Plan for 1.41 acres of a 7.25 acre tract owned by Chandler Concrete Coat any. The request for redesfgnation of the 1.41 acre site from 12ura1 Residemial to Ten Year Transition/C~n[nercial-Ir~ustrial Transistion Activity Node has been submitted to lega7.].y address wastewater runoff problems from an existi~ concrete plant site. The P1ann.ing Board motion to approve the 1.41. acre request resulted in a 4 to 4 vote with one abstention. The Planning Staff recommends approval of the request. PUBLIC Hk'ARLNG Y~,S DD(~fRID C,LOSID. Nation was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Cc¢[u[iissioner Walker to approve the r~.tion of the Planning Staff. Conanissioner Marshall stated that the three conditions required by the Ordinance have ryot been met. The request is not to correct an error or mission in the plan, and it is not in response to changed or changing conditions and is not a response to changes ira the Land Use Policy. Commissioner Carey noted the only justification the applicant could have for requesting a change in the Land Use Plan would be a charxJe fn the conditions, and he is not cornrinced that the change in ~nditions asserted by the applicant were conditions that the Board had in mind when the plan was adapted. He feels, however, there is a significant risk of damaging the environmrent surrounding the area if the problem is not corrected. Geoffrey Gledhill indicated that the request is a change to the Land Use Plan and not a change to the Zoning Atlas. f~ change to the Zoning Atlas would occur upon the approval of the Planned Development application. Chair Willhoit stated that under the current Laal Use Plan and with the current zoning designation, Chandler Concrete caul.d relocate the ponds to other portions of the existing plant site, and nc further permits or approvals would be required. &e proposed that this item as well as item G-10 relating to the Special Use Permit be tabled and referred to the Plannim Staff for the development of a landscape plan that would specifically address those concerns brought out at the public hearing. Planning Director Marvin Collins indicated the screening as proposed by the applicant does meet the requirements of the Qrdinanrp, The only