Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-06-1998 - 5d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1998
>
Agenda - 10-06-1998
>
Agenda - 10-06-1998 - 5d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2010 3:52:26 PM
Creation date
6/30/2010 3:52:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/6/1998
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5d
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19981006
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1998
RES A Resolution Requesting That the NCACC Consider proposing legislation of statewide applicability on certain issues for consideration during the 1999 session of the NC General Assembly 10-06-1998-5d
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\1990-1999\1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />* Economic Development District - I-85/Buckhorn Road <br />- would result in additional transportation costs due to <br />distance from recyclable generation centers <br />- property probably more expensive that non-EDD options <br />(est. $20,000-$30,000 acre) <br />- would move a solid waste operation to a different <br />neighborhood <br />- development ordinance would need to be amended to allow <br />facility <br />- would not contribute to notion of integrating solid <br />waste facilities <br />* Economic Development District - I-40/Old Highway 86 <br />- would result in additional transportation costs due to <br />distance from recyclable generation centers; however, <br />this EDD is the most convenient to the recyclable <br />waste generation centers of the three EDD's <br />- property probably more expensive that non-EDD options <br />(est. $20,000-$30,000 acre) <br />- would move a solid waste operation to a different <br />neighborhood <br />- development ordinance would need to be amended to allow <br />facility <br />- would not contribute to notion of integrating solid <br />waste facilities - <br />* Economic Development District - I-85/US Highway 70 - <br />- would result in additional transportation costs due to <br />distance from recyclable generation centers <br />- property probably more expensive that non-EDD options <br />(est. $20,000-$30,000 acre) <br />- would move a solid waste operation to a different <br />neighborhood <br />- development ordinance would need to be amended to allow <br />facility <br />- would not contribute to notion of integrating solid <br />waste facilities - <br />* Eubanks Road site (3 parcels directly west of North Eubanks <br />Road landfill property) - Original Staff Recommendation <br />- would integrate into current operations <br />- continued impact to already impacted neighborhoods <br />- near recyclable generation centers, minimizing <br />transportation costs <br />- estimated moderate Land cost (est. $13,000-$15,000 <br />acre) <br />- provides most flexibility for design and operation <br />- would require some use or threat of eminent domain for <br />one or two of the three parcels . <br />* Closed North Eubanks landfill ;(Agenda #l0a) <br />- would integrate into current operations <br />- continued impact to already impacted neighborhoods <br />- near recyclable generation centers, minimizing <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.