Browse
Search
Minutes - 19850910
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Minutes - 19850910
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 12:40:32 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:45:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/10/1985
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ooo~~~ <br />Beverly Kawalec expressed concern with the power line through the <br />development. She felt it was an obtrusive eyesore and that Chapel Hi11 staff <br />should include (1) stipulations which require that the recreation axes be moved <br />outside of the power line easement, (2) a stipulation for a 50' buffer between <br />buildable area and the easement observing all setbacks, aad (3) a dedication to <br />the Town of Chapel Hill of pedestrian easement within all pourer line easements. <br />Commissioner Lloyd inquired how many acres of water was behind the dam. <br />Collins responded 1-1/2 acres. <br />Mayor Nassif stated that the power line easement should not be platted in <br />the lots at all, just be a space marked easement. He noted that this would be <br />part of his motion when the project comes to the Town Council for a vote. He <br />noted there were computations which could be done for the reservoir in case of <br />a dam blowout. He felt the applicant should furnish this computation. <br />Commissioner Carey inquired. if the power line easement was included in <br />the floor area ratio and Collins responded qes. He continued asking if the <br />ordinance allowed this and the response was yes. <br />David Pasquini inquired if staff would confirm the potential presence of <br />a stream subject to the Resource Conservation District requirements and .would <br />inform the Town Council and Walden responded yes. He cited the potential <br />effects on lots 12. 13. 40, 41. 42, and 43. <br />Mayor Nassif expressed concern with the contours of the lots located <br />across Weaver Dairy Road from the proposed Bradley Road extension in regards tv <br />a proposed collector road. Collins responded that topographical maps were used <br />to plot out the alignment of the collector street. Nassif asked if there was to <br />be an overpass on Sunrise Road and Collins responded yes. <br />Settp Margison inquired about the timing for the road construction. The <br />developer responded approximately 3 years. <br />Allen Aldridge, applicant. was sworn in for his statement. <br />Barry Jacobs inquired about traffic projections in regard to I-40. <br />Collins referred this question to the applicant and noted that Chapel Hill <br />staff had done a Weaver Dairy Road impact study. Walden responded that Chapel <br />Hill staff had prepared a corridor study of Weaver Dairy Road from NC S6 to U5 <br />15-501. The three intersections studied were NC $6/Weaver Dairy Raad. Erwin <br />Road/15-5D1s and Erwin 8oad/Weaver Dairy Road. The conclusions were as <br />follows: <br />(1) Considering the existing conditions and. developments approved, but <br />not qet constructed, there is a problem of overcapacity at the l5 501/Erwin <br />Road intersection. This will be partially mitigated by the improvements <br />proposed for Sage Road Extension <br />(2) The Erwin Rd/Weaver Dairy Road intersection is not yet at capacity <br />(3) The Weaver Dairy/NC 86 intersection is well below capacity <br />Walden noted that this study did not address the impacts of I-40. <br />Jacobs asked for NCDOT projections of Z-40 impacts on the area. <br />Willhoit reviewed the procedures to adjourn the public hearing. <br />Allen Aldridge. applicant, requested permission to speak. Willhoit noted <br />that the hearing had been continued to receive staff reparta. He stated that <br />Mr. Aldridge could speak to those concerns. <br />Mr. Aldridge began by apologizing to the Boards for bringing this project <br />forward in the manner in which it was presented. He noted there was great <br />difficulty in trying to deal with 4 bodies ( 2 Administrative staffs and 2 <br />governmental agencies) as well as OWASA. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.