Minutes - 19850826 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Metadata

Thumbnails

Annotations

~~~~~~ He expressed concern about the irresponsible action of the opposition in referencing that the Rhines' were ~tricked~ and that somehow he was involved. He noted that he did not buy the property from the Rhines, but was solicited by a subsequent owner of the property who approached him regarding its availability for purchase. He continued that he was not aware of the sequence of events leading up to the sale. He emphasized that the stated requirement that the property be used only for residential use was not part of the public record. He continued that the deed does not show that the property came from the Rhine Estate. He continued that he felt it was important not to have the comment regarding being ~tricked~~ linger in the Boards` mind. 3_ PD-4-85 CAANDLER_C4NCRETE COMPAI~C The presentation was made by Susan Smith. She informed the Boards that the screening and lot size requirements had not been satisfied, but continued that staff would recommend that the lot size requirements be modified under Section 7.3 given the nature of the request. She continued that staff had been in contact with DEM as of this morning and that DEM verified that a three pond system was required to satisfy their requirements; that a runoff control system in this location was necessary as an immediate measure to address runoff in this area; and that the proposed recycling system is a long term proposal to address the applicant`s needs beyond the control of runoff. She noted that DEM had approved the submitted plans with the exception of a freeboard requirement which the applicant has subsequently indicated he will comply with. Thomas Chandler requested that all materials submitted far the Land IIse Plan application be made part of the record an the rezoning request. Ae also requested that his written comments be made part of the record. The Board concurred. Chandler subsequently read the lettex from Jon Harder. Phil Post, engineer for the applicant, spoke on the project and clarified that he would address what will happen to the runoff on the site and the nature of the materials in the ponds. He noted that the materials are not hazardous and that they will not be leaving the ait~ which would substantially improve the current situation. He described the recycling facilitq noting that the solids and liquids derived from the system will be reused in the plant as recycled materials. IIntil this system is in place accumulated solids will be removed by trucks. Post cited a map prepared to illustrate the nature of the request noting the actual acreage to be utilized for the operation is very limited once you identify rightrof-way. open space and screening proposed. He clarified that the area designated in pink is the use area and includes .74 acres. Poet clarified that the applicant must meet the specifics of the site plan upon development of the site. He continued that maintenance of facilities installed is also required as a condition of approval and that this would address landscaping and the integrity of system. Fritz Bxunssen, engineer for the applicant, addressed traffic flow. He noted that driveway C is in the middle of the turn and has limited sight distance and that the applicant proposes to use Driveway B to enter and load the vehicles and then use Driveway D to exit the tract. He continued noting that NCDOT accepted the proposed driveway as having safer sight distance and that the driveway is higher than the road. He noted that truck parking will