Browse
Search
Minutes - 19850826
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1985
>
Minutes - 19850826
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 12:42:08 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:45:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/26/1985
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Q~QN~4 <br />notified of the development of the Central Orange Area Study, notices were <br />posted on local properties and notices were published in the local newspaper. <br />Commissioner Carey inquired if the boundary fox the zoning lots was <br />an arbitrary boundary. Smith reviewed the History of the development of the <br />plan. noting that zoning boundaries did not necessarily follow property lines, <br />that the drainage basins for public water and Bawer eexvice were an important <br />criteria in determining the boundary for certain planning designations, that <br />there was considerable community opposition from those residing at the <br />intersection of NC 86 and Old 010 to nonresidential development in the area; <br />and the designation of the Commercial Industrial Transition Activity Node area <br />was linked to those areas designated as Transition; and that the <br />indentification of a potential service area for public water and sewer given <br />drainage basin boundaries had limited the designation of Transition and. <br />subsequently. Industrial areas. <br />Gordon inquired why a Soil and Erosion Control permit was issued. <br />Smith responded that clearing of property and control of runoff from adjacent <br />properties may or may not relate tv the uses permitted. She noted that upon <br />further review by staff, the staff determined that, in this case, the runoff <br />central facilities could Hat be disassociated from the industrial use. <br />Commissioner Lloyd inquired if the whale tract is zoned. Smith <br />responded that the designation of a zoning lot does not necessarily correspond <br />with the ownership of the property, but generally relates to the use area. <br />Kizer indicated that the Board had been persuaded to ~gxandfather~ <br />in this use when Hillsborough was zoned given that the lot area was small, <br />there was no room for expansion and given the plant's fifteen year history at <br />that location. <br />Chandler commented that the topography does not allow for the use <br />of the land for trucks to turn away from the plant and utilize driveways A ox B <br />given the presence of the railroad tracks. On the other side of the plant ase <br />fuel tanks. The only possible exit £or loaded trucks is Driveway C which has <br />been used since the plant was constructed. Driveway A was constructed by <br />English Co. to get to their barricades, not by Chandler Concrete. <br />Commissioner Willhoit inquired shout screening requirements. Smith <br />responded that the screening requirements are specifically stated in the <br />ordinance. She described the applicant's proposal commenting that the applicant <br />had indicated during the public hearing his desire t0 comply with all the <br />requirements. <br />Smith cited the letters from the Town of Aillsborough regarding <br />water and sewer services availability, noting that the following comments are <br />applicable to all of the subsequent .projects to be considered at this public <br />hearing. She informed the Board that the Town of Aillsborough Board had <br />endorsed their previous commitment to service these projects and had also <br />adopted amendments to the water and sewer extension policy which were suggested <br />by the Orange County Planning Staff to address concerns with the procedures for <br />Town approval of service extensions. She noted that the Town Board had <br />determined that only new submittals would be subject to the revised policy. <br />Gordon inquired why the projects were continued and why this item <br />had been continued from the February public hearing. Smith reviewed the <br />history of subsequent action on this matter noting it was the staff's and <br />applicant's desire to resolve the water and sewer issue with the Town of <br />Hillsborough to assure compliance with the Orange County Zoning Ordinance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.