Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-10-1998 - Attachment #11
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1998
>
Agenda - 11-10-1998
>
Agenda - 11-10-1998 - Attachment #11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/14/2013 2:18:40 PM
Creation date
6/25/2010 4:20:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/10/1998
Meeting Type
Schools
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
Attachment #11
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19981110
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INTRODUCTION <br />Since 1993, the Chapel Hill- Carrboro City Schools have been implementing new programs <br />to meet the needs of disengaged learners at the middle and high school level. An on -going <br />part of this conversation has been the need for a free - standing alternative school to serve <br />youth that are severely disaffected from the educational process. During this period, <br />legislation was enacted that allowed for an increase in the number of long -term suspensions <br />and expulsions furthering this school district's concerns about students who find <br />themselves out of the educational system with few, if any, options for return. In addition <br />to students who have been long -term suspended or expelled, other students have <br />experienced school disruptions that, in effect, curtail their educational opportunities. The <br />Chapel -Hill Carrboro City Schools alternative school was proposed as a mechanism to <br />educate these students and to assist them in finding ways to maintain long -term school <br />success. <br />The Chapel Hill- Carrboro City Schools Alternative School, now known as Phoenix <br />Academy, opened its doors to students in February of 1998. Phoenix Academy is part of a <br />continuum of services for students experiencing school difficulties. For students who have <br />been- long-term suspended or expelled, Phoenix Academy represents their only public <br />school option. Other students who have experienced repeated difficulties, either <br />behaviorally or academically can be recommended to the program and may attend on a <br />voluntary basis. <br />The alternative school proposal, approved by the Chapel Hill- Cairboro City School Board <br />last year, contained an evaluation requirement. Dr. Muni V. Chapman of the UNC -CH <br />School of Social Work designed and carried out the evaluation plan. This report details <br />selected findings from that evaluation. <br />EVALUATION METHODS <br />This evaluation consists of three components. The first component included pre and post- <br />test measures on correlates of school success using the School Success Profile -OL (SSP - <br />OL), an on -line survey completed by student participants whose parents have given consent <br />for participation. The SSP, created by Drs. Gary L. Bowen and Jack M. Richman, is <br />designed to (a) describe students selected for program participation; (b) inform the process <br />by which each student is provided with a comprehensive program of services; (c) monitor <br />changes in program participants over time. <br />The survey is informed by an ecological perspective and was created after a comprehensive <br />review of the literature related to school success. The SSP -OL measures strengths and <br />weaknesses in life areas known to enhance or detract from school performance: <br />neighborhood, family, friends, and school. It is designed for use with middle school and <br />high school age students (10- 18 years of age). Each student who completes the SSP <br />receives an individualized summary report that includes two profiles: (1) The Social <br />Environment Profile, which includes 11 sub - dimensions and (2) The Individual Adaptation <br />Profile, which includes 12 sub - dimensions. Student responses are compared to a national <br />random sample of students. The national sample was conducted by Louis Harris and <br />Associates, Inc. between October 31 and February 15, 1997. Yielding a nationally <br />representative sample of 2099 in grades 6 to 12, the Harris methodology involved a <br />stratified two -stage sampling design. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.