Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-10-1998 - Attachment #8
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1998
>
Agenda - 11-10-1998
>
Agenda - 11-10-1998 - Attachment #8
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2015 4:31:39 PM
Creation date
6/25/2010 4:14:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/10/1998
Meeting Type
Schools
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
Attachment #8
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19981110
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHAPEL HILL - CARRBORO CITY SCHOOLS <br />Lincoln Center, Merritt Mill Road <br />Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27516 <br />Telephone: (919) 967 -8211 <br />Neil G. Pedersen <br />Superintendent <br />TO: Board of Education <br />FROM: Neil G. Pederse <br />Superintendent <br />Ann Hart, Assistant Superintendent <br />for Instructional Services <br />Chester Prayer, Assistant Superintendent <br />for Support Services <br />RE: Teachers' Local Salary Supplement <br />DATE. February 23, 1998 <br />I was pleased with the discussion that the Board had at its February 12, 1998 <br />meeting regarding changes to the teacher supplement. We all agree that the supplement is <br />inadequate and needs to be competitive with the highest paying school districts in the state. <br />In fact, there is consensus that our teachers should receive the highest local supplement in <br />the state in light of the cost of living in this community and the high expectations that are <br />placed on our teachers. <br />I am recommending that the following changes be made to the local teacher <br />supplement schedule as soon as funds become available: <br />1. Endorse Option C and phase in its implementation over five years <br />according to the following schedule: <br />Experience <br />Present <br />0-4 yrs. <br />5% <br />5 -9 yrs. <br />6% <br />10-14 yrs. <br />10% <br />15 -19 yrs. <br />15% <br />20-24 yrs <br />20% <br />25+ yrs. <br />25% <br />Projected Cost: <br />2. Remove th e <br />transferred into the <br />teaching experience <br />Year 1 <br />Year 2 <br />Year 3 <br />Year 4 <br />Year 5 <br />6% <br />7% <br />8% <br />9% <br />10% <br />7% <br />8% <br />9% <br />10% <br />11% <br />10% <br />10% <br />10% <br />11% <br />12% <br />no change <br />no change <br />no change <br />$107,100 <br />$107,100 <br />$107,100 <br />$170,100 <br />$170,100 <br />ten year (10%) cap on the number of years that can be <br />district after four consecutive years of successful <br />In the district. This would apply to teachers already <br />affected by this cap as well as to new hires. (Specific years are indicated <br />because the costs would change if implementation were delayed. The costs <br />are cumulative such that if this change were first implemented in 1999 -00, <br />the cost for the first year would be 186,000). <br />1998 -99 1999 -00 2000 -01 2001 -02 2002 -03 <br />Projected Cost: $127,500 $58,500 $135,500 $59,500 based on <br />1998 -99 hires <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.