Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-10-1998 - Attachment #4a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1998
>
Agenda - 11-10-1998
>
Agenda - 11-10-1998 - Attachment #4a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2015 4:33:08 PM
Creation date
6/25/2010 3:57:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/10/1998
Meeting Type
Schools
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19981110
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
level and would need to be addressed before these recommendations moved forward, they <br />do not seem to be entirely prohibitive. <br />Financial Implications and Strategies for Generating Savings and <br />Increasing Revenues <br />The number of additional teachers needed is substantial. If these standards were <br />fully implemented in the year 2000, we would need an additional 66 elementary teachers, <br />28 middle school teachers, and nine high school teachers. It is hard to envision this plan <br />moving forward without identifying some significant cost reductions that could be achieved <br />in our local budget. Strategies for providing funding differ according to the level of <br />schooling. The following strategies were discussed but are not necessarily recommended <br />• Elementary: Possible strategies for reallocating personnel include reducing the <br />number of teacher assistants and using non - classroom teaching positions differently. If <br />schools are willing to trade off these positions for a lower class size, then this proposal <br />becomes much more financially feasible. <br />• Middle: Middle schools also could reallocate teacher assistant positions, but this <br />would be difficult because the number of assistants in middle schools is lower (1 per <br />100 students). Furthermore, many of these positions already have been re- allocated by <br />schools. Another possibility would be for core teachers to teach an elective, which <br />would mean that fewer elective and more core teachers could be staffed. Neither of <br />these options is very feasible or desirable. It appears that additional funds for <br />classroom teachers would need-to be allocated at the middle school level to implement <br />this plan successfully. <br />• High: The number of teachers needed at the high school level is more modest. Some <br />savings could be achieved by administrative and support personnel teaching a period, <br />providing additional compensation for teachers who teach an extra class, and <br />contracting for services in some classes. <br />A number of suggestions were made for how the district could generate additional <br />funds to support this effort. They included the following: <br />• Reduce the number of school and central office administrators <br />• Pursue grants as part of a start-up or research effort <br />• Convert new vocational education dollars to this use <br />• Contract for services when this would produce savings (teaching, administration, and <br />operations) <br />• Reduce otter district expenses and overhead <br />No conclusions were reached concerning the feasibility of any of these strategies or <br />the amount of savings that might be achieved Clearly, only a small percentage of the costs <br />of reducing class size could be achieved through these steps. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.