Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-17-1998 - 9f
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1998
>
Agenda - 11-17-1998
>
Agenda - 11-17-1998 - 9f
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2015 4:20:37 PM
Creation date
6/25/2010 12:51:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/17/1998
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9f
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19981117
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
E CG <br />N c Orange irounr Recreation and Pazks Depart anent <br />H p.0. Box 5 i8 • '.iCo w. T:ycn Suet • HiisL—rovgh. NC 2-2 -S <br />TO: Karen Lincoln <br />Orange County Planning Department <br />FR0�1: B Director <br />DATE: November 4, 1998 <br />RE: Price Creek Subdivision <br />As per our conversation regarding Price Creek Subdivision, the following concerns <br />establishes the reason for the staff recommendation to accept payment in lieu of <br />land dedication. Having reviewed the concept plan, we determined that the minimum <br />amount of land required for dedication would result in a very narrow strip east of <br />Price Creek and would not adequately accommodate a trail that could adjoin the <br />dedicated lands of Oak Crest Subdivision to the north. Other concerns were that <br />there were only two lots in Orange County and that the trail going south for <br />approximately 250 feet would meet a dead end at the Chatham County line. Also, <br />the land east of Price Creek is very low in elevation and a large flood plain area <br />would require a much greater width to construct even a primitive trail. <br />It has also been pointed out that two parcels of land in the Oak Crest subdivision <br />intended to be deeded to Orange County in 1989 had in fact not been deeded at all <br />and that the lots in question may not have been included in the Joint Planning Area <br />maps showing proposed greenways since the county line has changed. <br />Last night at the November 3 meeting of the Recreation and Parks Advisory Council <br />all information was again reviewed. It was the consensus of the members present <br />that the minimum amount of land required for dedication (1/20 of an acre) of the <br />approximately five acres of the two lots ( 411 and #12) would not be beneficial to <br />the proposed greenway to the north and that trails meandering along streams should <br />be constructed in greenways with a width of 30 -50 feet or more especially in flood <br />plains in order to reach higher elevations and circumvent trees and slopes. Members <br />of the Advisory Council recommended accepting payment in lieu of dedication at <br />3455 per lot unless more land could be acquired. <br />Please contact me if I can be of further assistance. <br />i <br />T= LF ?HONL5 <br />A.9—Si CODE 919 <br />32 -dlSl <br />0&7311 <br />'s10> _7•ro3t <br />A11GNT: a1 +3010 <br />Z. <br />VC 044 - ?C:_ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.