Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-17-1998 - 9d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1998
>
Agenda - 11-17-1998
>
Agenda - 11-17-1998 - 9d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2015 4:23:03 PM
Creation date
6/25/2010 12:47:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/17/1998
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9d
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19981117
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t�F�ANGE CG1UNTlf PROP�SAL TQ�1M�1 t�F:CARR��iR�t I��P�N�E fiQWN OF�H�►►PEL HILI FtESP4NS� '' <br /> The Board endorsed a conceptual revenue <br /> structure that: <br /> 1. finances core operation(MRF,MSW and <br /> C&D Landfillsj through tipping fees <br /> 2. fmances collection/transportation activities <br /> through property taxes and collection charges <br /> 3. finances reduction/recycling through tipping <br /> fees to the extent practical,with the balance <br /> from availability fees <br /> The Board indicated it willingness to consider We support pay-as-you-throw as a means of <br /> pay-per-throw as a revenue and waste regulation resulting in significant waste <br /> reduction tool. reduction, as contained in the County-wide <br /> solid waste management plan. Pay-as-you- <br /> throw as a financing mechanism may be most <br /> suitable for financing waste collection and <br /> disposal services. We also believe that the I <br /> financing of collection and disposal costs <br /> should be left up to each jurisdiction. <br /> It is important that an indirect cost study be We recommend that the County begin using <br /> accomplished, if the County assumes the lead the existing administrative overhead formula <br /> role, so that administrative cost allocations for and, once they gain experience, conduct an <br /> required County support(personnel, finance, analysis of their real costs and make <br /> purchasing, budget, attorney, etc.)can be adjustments as necessary. <br /> accurately determined. <br /> Additional Comments: We recommend that the Carrboro Board of <br /> Aldermen, the Chapel Hill Town Council, and <br /> the Orange county Board of Commissioners <br /> conclude remaining issues concerning <br /> governing with the establishment of a <br /> conference committee made up of 2 <br /> representatives of each jurisdiction. Such a <br /> committee would try to resolve all differences, <br /> identify any areas of disagreement remaining <br /> and revise the draft Interlocal Agreement. <br /> N <br /> C <br /> C.\windows\lemp�l1-06-98.DOC 8 Printed: 11/12/98 � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.