Orange County NC Website
ORANGE COUNTY <br />BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br />ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br />Meeting Date: November 17, 1998 <br />Action Agenda <br />Item No. R ~ C <br />SUBJECT: Frances Mikles Property Tax Refund Request <br />DEPARTMENT: Assessor's Office <br />PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) <br />BUDGET AMENDMENT: (Y/N) 1~0 ~:' <br />ATTACHMENT(S): <br />Resolution <br />Tax Refund Requests <br />INFORMATION CONTACT: <br />John Smith, Jr., ext 2101 <br />TELEPHONE NUMBERS: <br />Hillsborough 732-8181 <br />Chapel Hill 968-4501 <br />Durham 688-7331 <br />Mebane 227-2031 <br />PURPOSE: To consider adoption of refund resolution related to 1 request for property tax refund. <br />BACKGROUND: General Statute 105-381(b), "Action of Governing Body" provides that "upon <br />receiving a taxpayer's written statement of defense and request for release or refund, the governing <br />body of the Taxing Unit shall within 90 days after receipt of such a request determine whether the <br />taxpayer has a valid defense to the tax imposed or any part thereof and shall either release or refund <br />that portion of the amount that is determined to be in excess of the correct liability or notify the <br />taxpayer in writing that no release or refund will be made". <br />At the November 4, 1998 meeting, the Board considered a request from Mrs. Frances Mikles to <br />refund a portion of property taxes that she paid for tax years 1993 through 1997. The requested <br />refund totals $759.99. The Assessor's office ascertained that she had been improperly taxed for <br />288 square feet of heated space, which should have been taxed instead as an unheated carport. This <br />error has been corrected for 1998 and subsequent tax years. The County Attorney advised that the <br />measurement error involved in this case is not a "clerical error" within the meaning of the applicable <br />statute, and that there is not a statutory basis for granting the requested refund. <br />The Board's vote was 2-2 on a motion to grant the refund request by Mrs. Mikles. The Board <br />indicated that it would like to take this issue up again when all Board members will be present at the <br />November 17 meeting. Per the County Attorney's advice, parliamentary procedure requires that <br />one of the Board members who did not vote in favor of the November 4 motion (Commissioners <br />Carey, Crowther, or Gordon) must make a motion to reconsider this item and that motion must be <br />carried in order for the Board to reconsider the tax refund request of Mrs. Mikles. If the Board <br />adopts such a motion, the Board would then conduct a separate vote on the refund request itself. <br />