Orange County NC Website
42 <br />North Carolina to be stored at the Barnwell site. That waste is generally generated by the medical <br />community. <br />The high level nucleaz waste in question at Shearon Harris consists of the spent fuel rods from a nucleaz <br />reactor itself. Waste or spent fuel rods are the result of the process of nucleaz or radioactive decay <br />during use. Through the decay process, the fuel rods lose a great deal of their initial capacity to produce <br />a sustained high level (but controlled) nucleaz fission reaction (which produces the enormous quantities <br />of heat that aze used to make steam that turns or powers steam turbines which produce electricity). <br />Though still quite hazardous, in terms of radioactive emissions, the spent fuel rods are typically stored <br />on site in a "temporary" storage pool. These pools aze large in-ground concrete containment structures <br />which were originally designed to temporarily hold the spent fuel rods (that aze held in concrete and <br />metal casks) submerged under water. The water serves to reduce or absorb the heat generated by the <br />rods and prevent the escape of radioactivity. In the original strategy for dealing with the spent storage <br />rods, the federal government was to provide along-term high level radioactive waste storage site at <br />Yucca Mountain, Nevada. The on-site temporary storage pools were intended to hold the spent fuel rods <br />until arrangements could be made to ship them to Yucca Mountain. The federal government has not <br />constructed the Yucca Mountain storage site and it does not appear that it will be able to provide high- <br />level radioactive waste storage at any time in the near future. Nuclear power plants have been forced to <br />provide long term storage for their spent fuel rods in their temporary storage pools. <br />There are numerous elements of concern, not necessarily specific to the Sheazon Harris site, related to <br />long .term storage of spent fuel rods at temporary storage sites. Those concerns relate to: 1) loss of <br />water from the storage pool which could lead to superheating of remaining water and an atmospheric <br />release of radioactivity; 2) loss of water allowing the formation of a critical or neaz-critical mass and <br />melt-down of the still highly radioactive fuel rods that have been stored in a facility containing more <br />nuclear material arranged in a more densely packed configuration than was originally anticipated in the <br />design for the temporary storage facilities; 3) increased likelihood of radioactivity releases due to human <br />error caused by greatly increased levels of nuclear materials handling. activity and tighter quarters in <br />storage areas; 4) increased likelihood of radioactivity release due to the increased levels of handling and <br />shipping of nucleaz materials between nucleaz power facilities, etc. These concerns are exacerbated by <br />the public perception that there is no such thing as a minor nuclear accident. There aze also serious and <br />widespread public concerns about the efficacy of the Nucleaz Regulatory Commission's (NRC) use of its <br />rules and its enforcement activities as it is both the primary nuclear regulatory agency and one of chief <br />proponents of the use of nucleaz power. The adequacy of NRC rules and standazds related to storage <br />pools has also been called into question, because the pools were, after all, intended and designed to <br />provide only temporary storage. <br />CP&L has been storing spent fuel rods on-site in its temporary storage pool at Shearon Harris since the <br />facility's first refueling operation. According to CP&L, the Sheazon Harris plant it is the newest nuclear <br />facility and contains the most modern and up-to-date technology. Accordingly, CP&L has designated <br />(and apparently used) the Shearon Harris plant as its storage site for spent fuel rods from its Brunswick, <br />NC, and Robinson, SC, nucleaz plants as well. The original design for Sheazon Harris called for four <br />reactors. This was later scaled back to one reactor, but at least some of the construction was completed <br />for four temporary fuel storage pools. Two were completed and put into operation while two others <br />were left incomplete. CP&L contents that the safest and most economically feasible strategy for storage <br />