Orange County NC Website
37 <br />Appendix A <br />~' June 1981: A spent fuel assembly at Donald C. Cook Unit 1 was damaged <br />o when its lo~•er end struck a ledge outside of the reactor pressure vessel. During <br />lifting of the fuel assembly from the core, the two air lines and the electric cable <br />serving the gripper tangled and caught the gripper-tube-up position switch, clos- <br />~' ing it before the gripper tube and attached fuel assembly were in the full-up posi- <br />lion inside the canister. Closing the switch cleared the interlock allowing lateral <br />n;, movement of the manipulator crane. The lower end of the fuel assembly pro- <br />- <br />~, traded below the canister and it struck a ledge on the refueling cavity floor just <br />outside the reactor pressure vessel area. Several fuel rods in the assembly were <br />~° damaged ~•ith one fuel rod dislodging from the assembly and falling onto the <br />n reactor cavity floor.'" <br />i February 1986: An irradiated fuel assembly was inadvertently lifted from <br />E the Haddam Neck core when the upper core support structure was removed <br />f from the reactor vessel. The irradiated fuel assembly stuck to the structure <br />c because of a bent fuel assembly locating pin. AS the structure was moved lateral- <br />ly, the assembly struck the core barrel and dropped two to four feet onto the core. <br />The dropped assembly and the two irradiated fuel assemblies it impacted were <br />4 damaged." <br />June 1994: While lowering a fuel assembly into the Quad Cities Unit 1 reac- <br />e for core, the lower end-fitting caught on either the edge of the control rod blade <br />guide or the upper core grid plate. The operator did not notice that the lower end- <br />= fitting was caught and continued to lower the fuel assembly. A fuel handling ver- <br />ifier noticed the problem when the fuel assembly was leaning 45° to 65' from ver- / <br />tical and notified the operator. The fuel assembly was raised, repositioned, aril <br />~. inserted into the core. After inserting the fuel assembly into the core, the refuel- <br />', ing grapple would not release from the fuel assembly's bail handle. The fuel <br />;assembly was returned to the spent fuel pool. Inspection determined that the <br />refueling mast grapple would not release because the bail handle had been bent. <br />No other damage to the fuel assembly or adjacent core components was identi- <br />fied. <br />:;~ May 1995: As a storage cask loaded with 40 spent fuel assemblies was lifted <br />out of the Prairie Island spent fuel pool, an overload device actuated to stop the <br />~r. . <br />w'ane's movement. The storage cask's bottom remained three inches below the <br />f top of the spent fuel pool's walls. The loaded cask remained suspended over the <br />spent fuel pool for nearly 16 hours until station personnel manually bypassed the <br />overload interlock to permit the crane to resume lifting. <br />~., <br />`~~' June 1995: The lower tie plate and 41 fuel rods separated from the upper rie <br />plate and the remaining eight fuel rods while an irradiated fuel assembly ~•as <br />`.being relocated ti•ithin the Oyster Creek spent fuel pool. The fuel assembly had <br />~: operated in the Oyster Creek reactor during the 19i0s before being discharged in <br />~, April 1980. A similar event occurred at Ouster Creek in 1986. Following the earli- <br />:~ er event, the fuel rods ~-ere remo~•ed from the broken fuel assembly and placed <br />~• into a defecti~•e fuel canister.' <br />169 <br />