Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-17-1998 - 5a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1990's
>
1998
>
Agenda - 11-17-1998
>
Agenda - 11-17-1998 - 5a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/25/2010 12:11:33 PM
Creation date
6/25/2010 12:11:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/17/1998
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19981117
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1990's\1998
RES-1998-039 A Resolution Regarding Proposed Expansion of High Level Radioactive Waste Storage Facilies at CP &L Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant 11-17-1998-5a
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\1990-1999\1998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
32 <br />Nuclear Wane Disposal Crisis <br />The cost of nut extending defense-in-depth to tipent fuel assembly storage at <br />nuclear pu..'er plant sites will range between Three Mile Island and Chernobyl <br />magnitude if a major accident happens at a facility where the second and third <br />laver of defense-in-depth are compromised. The Susquehanna concerns repre- <br />sented credible sequences that penetrated the second and third lavers fur a design <br />basis loss-uf-coolant accident with pustulated cure damage. <br />A major reactor accident like Three Vlile Island may never happen again <br />because the tint and second lavers of defense-in-depth combine to significantly <br />reduce this probability. But nuclear pu..•er plant operation in this country is pred- <br />icated on the knowledge that even if such an accident occurs, and e~•en if emer- <br />~encv systems fail to mitigate the accident and prevent fuel damage, containment <br />pro.'isions are in place to protect the public. <br />It is imperative that the nuclear pu..•er industry apply defense-in-depth <br />principles to spent fuel risk as rigorously as they are applied to reactor operation. <br />If the cost to achieve spent fuel risk defense-in-depth protection is prohibitive, <br />Congress must implement legislation that enables the Nuclear Waste Fund to <br />finance implementation of necessary safety measures. After all, the Nuclear <br />Waste Fund ~.•as established by the rate pa~•en of utilities with nuclear power <br />plants. These rate payers have the spent fuel assemblies stored at these plants in <br />their back yards. Defense-in-depth protection, strung in theory and dem~nstrat- <br />ed effective at Three Mile Island, will resol~•e the crisis in nuclear waste disposal <br />and make these back yards sate. <br />1 \udear Fagulatun~ Cummueiun. "Fepurt un the .~cddent at the Chernobyl Nuclear Po..•er <br />Station." \'tr'REG-131 Rev 1. December 1QH~. p. 3-%. <br /> <br />it a important to dishnl;vish brn~•ren dn• uurae...•here irradiated fuel assemblies that hate <br />undergone se.•eral .•ean of rediuacn.•e deca.• are placed tntu hea.•tiv shielded casks, and an <br />accident drarning the ~.ater from a ~prnt fuel p.wl...~here irradiated fuel assemblies pose <br />~anuu: rodianun r.powre hazard. and :Quid .utter damage. <br />~ u,u <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.