Orange County NC Website
Nuclear Wasre Oisposai Crrsrs <br />applies to all nuclear pu~ver plants virtually all of the time; in fact, at all tiaiea <br />except fur those rare occasiun~ when a tuel assembly i5 dropped or the tooling <br />system Eails. ; <br />Atomic Energy of Canada, Limited (AECL) and Ontario Hydro eonduc <br />the first major spent fuel pool storage study during l9Ti-1975. Several spent fud <br />assemblies From nuclear pu~ver plants and experimental reactors were d''i5ass`~Oem. <br />bled and examined. The assemblies included in this study had been sto <br />spent fuel pools between l3 and 27 years. Destructive examinations were <br />formed on specific fuel rods From each spent fuel assembly, while the <br />fuel rods were returned to the spent fuel pools for continued storage. ~. <br />Ten years later, AECL and Ontario Hydro repeated the study to evalua <br />effects after another decade of storage. AECL and Ontario Hydro visually exam <br />fined the spent Euel assemblies. Nu indications of fuel rod cladding d <br />(i.e., pitting, galvanic corrosion, etc.) were observed on any fuel ~~ ~ <br />Neutron radiography techniques were used to took for the presence of~• <br />inside fuel rods. If water vas present inside a fuel rod, then that fuel: <br />cladding was known to be defective. The neutron radiography e.~caminatioas <br />1955-1959 indicated that no fuel rods had failed since the examinations <br />1975. '~' <br />During the 1955-1989 study, AECL performed gamma scanning of~ <br />spent fuel rods that had been in pool storage for 21 years. The gamma ~~ <br />results indicated no evidence of leaching or redistribution of fission pn~u <br />Euel rods. Room temperature ring-tensile tests were performed on 30 fuel <br />from 1.4 spent fuel assemblies that had been stored underc.•ater for 13 to 27 <br />The tests were conducted to determine if there had been amp change in ~dd~'i <br />mechanical properties due to storage under water. No significant difference <br />cladding's mechanical properties were identified. AECL and Ontario Hy~.,,~ <br />eluded from the studies that spent fuel assemblies can be safely stored underv <br />ter for at least ~0 vears.=' -` <br />EPRI and Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory researched empiri ~ <br />analytical information available through 198 on underwater scent Ebel <br />in this country. This team discovered nu evidence that spent toe! asse~b <br />degrade to any appreciable degree during long periods of underwater sto-~.,nr. <br />The team concluded that substantial technical basis exists to justify all <br />spent fuel to remain in vet storage fur several decades= <br />. =+a <br />Managing the Risks y~ <br />vuclear power plants hive stored spent fuel assemblies fur nearly ~0 etv -~ <br />without am• significant incidents. The primary threat to public health and saf e ,- <br />from spent fuel storage results from loss of spent foe! pool water inventory ~ . <br />consequences from a spent heel pool accident include butte radiation exposure <br />(5x1(7' person-rem) and expense 153.E billion in 1y53 dollars). Lzsser threats ro' <br />X20 <br />