Minutes - 19850603 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

0~~:f x.09 the intent that that portion be upgraded to state maintained standards at the point when the adjoining property is developed. Commissioner Garet' questioned how the new owners would be informed of these restrictions. Epting questioned the mechanism fox requiring new developers to upgrade and pay for a portion of the maintenance costs. Gledhill clarified that the road would be maintained by the owners whether the road is public or private until the state accepts the road for maintenance. Chair 4iillhoit requested that the attorney provide the wording for C5 so that the Road Maintenance Agreement include the stipulation for ~+~idening the initial portion of 433.54' tv Class ..A.. standards with the intent that it be brought up to state standards when the adjoining property is developed. Gledhill asked that he review and approve language to that effect proposed by the developers attorney. Commissioner Carey moved the amendment to the motion as specified above. Planning Board recommendations are: (1) a control corner be shown on the plat (2) indicate the lot area outside cf the right-of-way and label as such (3) indicate on the plat that no activity will be allowed inside of the 50' stream buffer (4) a Class ~B~~ pxivate road be constructed to Orange County Road Standards as requested by the applicant (5) the Road Maintenance Agreement include a stipulation which would allow the adjoining txact (Lot 16A). upon developing the tract, to use the easement (private road). VOTE: UNANIMOUS. Susan Smith presented for consideration of approval the Preliminary Plan for Stormy Acres Subdivision. The property is located in Chapel Aill Township off Aavis Road (SR 1129). Six lots are proposed out of approximately 10.9 acres. The property is zoned A-R and is designated the same in the Land Use Plan. The applicant proposes a Class A xoad to serve the six lots. The Planning Staff recommended a state maintained road. The Planning Board motion for approval with a Class ~~A~ road failed. No subsequent motion eras heard on the item upon directive of the Planning Board Chair. Alois Callemyn indicated that if the six (6) lot subdivision with a Class ~A~ road is not approved> the developer would combine two lots making it a five lot subdivision. He pointed out on the map that lot three is not served by the proposed road. He questioned the lot count used by staff to determine the recommendation for a public road. Susau Smith explained that a 50-foot right-of -way is proposed to expand a subdivision road previously approved with a partial width right-of- way. The recommendation for a public road constructed to state maintained road standards is based on the number of lots anticipated to be served by the road. including those south of the tract in question. Geoffrey Gledhill pointed out that the ~~lot count process~~ is not the only criteria to be used to decide whether the road should be private or public. Smith reviewed the lots located south of the tract to be served by r'h;Q rnar~ ;f rhoro ;s fitrthar development.