Browse
Search
Minutes 05-18-2010
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Minutes 05-18-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/20/2015 1:54:03 PM
Creation date
6/17/2010 12:07:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/18/2010
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 3a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 3b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 3c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 4a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 4c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 4d
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 4e
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 4f
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 4g
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 4h
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 4i
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 4j
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 4k
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 4l
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 4m
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 4n
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 4o
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 4p
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 7a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 8a
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 8b
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-18-2010 - 8c
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-18-2010-13 (1)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-18-2010-13 (2)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
Agenda - 05-18-2010-13 (3)
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2010\Agenda - 05-18-2010 - Regular Mtg.
ORD-2010-042 Fiscal Year 2009-2010 Budget Amendment #10
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2010
ORD-2010-042 Fiscal Year 2009-2010 Budget Amendment #10
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2010
ORD-2010-043 Senior Citizen Health Promotion Program Grant Project Ordinance
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2010
ORD-2010-044 Value Added Processing Center Capital Project Ordinance
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2010
ORD-2010-045 Personnel Ordinance Article IV, Family and Medical Leave
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2010
ORD-2010-045 Personnel Ordinance Article IV, Section 14.0 Family Leave
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2010-2019\2010
RES-2010-041 Resolution - Establishment of the County Capital Reserve Fund
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2010
RES-2010-042 Resolution Requesting Adoption of State Rules Requiring Early Implementation of Federal Standards for Hospital Medical & Infectious Waste Incinerators
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br /> able to leverage into international recognition by MSNBC. However, the funds are fully allocated, <br /> with numerous local businesses eager to participate whenever additional funding becomes <br /> available. Based on this history as well as the experience of small business funds available in <br /> Durham and Chatham counties, we recommend Orange County's small business fund be <br /> recapitalized. However, Orange County also needs a retention and recruitment fund designed to <br /> meet the needs of established local businesses who are expanding or incoming businesses who <br /> want to locate here and who likely will end up employing county residents or whose <br /> managers/executives will call Orange County home. Equally important, these funds must be <br /> administered with flexibility without lengthy, complex, or onerous procedures. Lastly, quality <br /> research capable of supporting cluster, R&D, gap, or revenue stream analyses requires both <br /> faculty and student involvement. Unlike this past year's student papers, which was pro bono and <br /> involved limited scope and time investment, cluster/R&D/gap/and funding stream analysis <br /> substantive research effort is provided only on a fee basis ranging from $25,000 to $250,000 or <br /> more. <br /> The total financial impact of this investment is <0.04% of the total county budget for FY 2010- <br /> 2011. <br /> Although Streamlined Permitting and the UDO are under the auspices of the Planning <br /> Department, the EDC views it as a critical path requirement for economic development, thus we <br /> recommend that the county invest staffing and resources necessary to achieve these in a <br /> timeframe that inspires confidence and trust among investors, site selection decision-makers, <br /> and the development community. Secondly, while extending full water/wastewater infrastructure <br /> into Buckhorn and Eno EDDs and satisfying all criteria required for NC Department of Commerce <br /> Site Certification are critical path elements, much of this investment also will be under the <br /> auspices of the Planning Department. Although the EDC's extended budget estimates the <br /> general magnitude of the investment required, to many unknowns exist to set expectations for a <br /> firm figure. <br /> FY 10-11 thru FY15-16 <br /> Estimated Economic Development Department <br /> Places <br /> •Estimate for Buckhorn EDD ($4,400,0000) <br /> •Eno EDD Engineering and Build-Out (TBD) <br /> •NC Department of Commerce Site Certification (TBD) <br /> Tools <br /> - Business retention, recruitment, and loan funds ($2,000,000) <br /> - Completion/implementation of County Unified Development Ordinance (TBD) <br /> Knowledge <br /> - RTRP Dues, Intra-County Collaboration Events, Focused Research, and Strategic <br /> Planning 300 000 <br /> Total = $6.7 million + Eno EDD + UDO <br /> We anticipate that the engineering, build-out, and NC DOC site certification will require 36-48 <br /> months at best, assuming no delays for Buckhorn EDD alone. Given the state of negotiations <br /> with Durham, we anticipate that it will require up to 72 months for engineering, build-out, and NC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.