Minutes - 19841126 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

~~~ 2 Smith .responded that rural industrial uses proposed were "limited" and could not generate impacts beyond the building itself. The Commercial Transition activity node classification would allow any commercial use. Mts. Gertrude Rippy expressed apposition to any commercial or industrial use in this area. She felt that the noise from I-40 would be enough disturbance as her home is less that 600 feet from z-40. (smith • identified Mrs. Rippy's property on the map). Jim Hawks spoke in favor of the study. f?is property will be split due to the relocatior. of New 86 and he felt it was-a fatal.loss to him for the use for which he currently utilizes his property. He would prefer to have his entire property coned commercial. (Smith identified the Hawk property on the map). Mike Dodson, who lives southeast of the interchange would like for his property to be in the Commercial Transition activity node. He does not wish to live so near I-40 and would prefer to move and have his property zoned commercial. 3. Smith made the presentation. The purpose of this agenda item is to receive public comment on three (3) Secondary Land Use Plan amendments as follows: _ LUP-4-84 Khye 67eng Pdg & Guat Chang Ng LUP-5-84 Bob and Rachael Scholar LUP-6-84 James L. Freeland All three amendment requests are located north of the Town of Hillsborough corporate limits territorial and extra-territorial planning jurisdiction within Hillsborough Township. All three request a redesignation from Agricultural-Residential to Ten Yeat Transition. Amendment of the Land Use Plan as requested would extend the Transition Area for the Town of Hillsbrorough north of the- current extraterritorial planning jurisdiction. Designation of a Ten Xear Transition Area provides for the full range of residential densities permitted under the Zoning Ordinance. Planning Staff recommends that the Land Use Plan be amended to designate the t~leno and Scholar tracts as Ten Year Transition. Planning Staff recommends that a larger area, which includes the Freeland tract, be considered for redesignation as Ten Xear Transition, after further study. Smith explained the difference between the Agricultural- Residential and the Ten Year Transition designations. She gave descriptions and locations of the properties in question and reviewed the applicable locational criteria. Commissioner tghitted inquired if this property had already been rezoned. Smith responded that it was the adjacent property that was previously rezoned PDI. Commissioner Marshall asked what is intended by the Ten Year and Twenty Year Transition plan categories.