Browse
Search
Minutes - 19841126
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1984
>
Minutes - 19841126
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 1:00:21 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:42:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/26/1984
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t: <br />3 ~' `` <br />15 <br />Commissioner :"_arshall questioned the staff on the justification used to <br />support this amendment. <br />Smith responded that the district is one of the two most intensive zoning <br />districts in the ordinance and that uses of similar impact are permitted in <br />this district. <br />Chair Ta'illhoit inquired about the use of property zoned CC-3 specifically <br />for car sales, citing the property located at Piatts/Star Point. Smith <br />_ responded that the property cou],d be used for any use permitted in the CC-3 <br />district according to the CC--3 district requirements. Assignment of a CC-3 <br />-,_ zoning district classification would require .satisfaction of the application <br />criteria for the district. <br />NOTE: COMri2SS20NER 4IALI~ER LEFT AT 10:15. <br />Commissioner rarshall asked if there were any other criteria to be applied <br />to this use in a CC-3 district. Smith responded no additional criteria was <br />proposed. <br />Commissioner tarshall asked staff to review the characteristics of the <br />CC-3 district. Smith reviewed the definition of the district, its intent <br />statemment, the application. criteria and the types of uses permitted in the <br />district. She noted that this use is appropriate in this district, citing the <br />range of uses permitted currently. <br />Commissioner Marshall inquired about materials staff review to came to a <br />decision on these matters. Smith cited Planning Advisory Service Reports and <br />other planning research and support data, as well as other. jurisdictions' <br />ordinances. <br />10. * ~ 4 - <br />The staff presentation was made by Susan Smith. <br />Commissioner Marshall asked if a time limit should be set on the construc- <br />tion period and presence of the temporary home. Chair willhoit concurred. <br />Yuhasz expressed concern that given the nature and use of temporary mobile <br />homes, a time limit was inappropriate. <br />Commissioner rarshall expressed concern about safety factors. <br />Pearson indicated that except for the thirty day removal period there <br />would not be twv livable structures on the same site. He added that the perms <br />vent or replacement structure would not be occupiable until a Certificate of <br />Occupancy is issued and that both the permanent and the temporary structure <br />must meet the requirements for issuance of the building permits. Smith <br />verified that both structures must comply with applicable requirements. <br />11. 7~Q <br />_ The staff presentation was made by Susan Smith. <br />No comment on the amendment was received. <br />--.. The public hearing was adjourned. <br />An~ouRrrrt~r~T <br />The Joint Public Hearing was adjourned. <br />Don Willhait, Chair <br />Beverly A. Blythe, Clerk <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.