Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-15-2010- 7d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Agenda - 06-15-2010 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 06-15-2010- 7d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2012 9:16:39 AM
Creation date
6/11/2010 4:29:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/15/2010
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7d
Document Relationships
Minutes 06-15-2010
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
RES-2010-054 Resolution Regarding the Use of Coal As An Energy Source for the Co-Generation Facility of UNC at Chapel Hill
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2010-2019\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Conclusions and Interim Recommendations <br />12 <br />Based on secondary research and expert testimony, the Energy Task Force makes the following six <br />near -term interim recommendations: <br />Interim Recommendation #1: End all use of coal on the UNC- Chapel Hill campus by May 1, 2020. <br />Once a firm date for conversion is established and an alternate fuel supplier is contracted, UNC - <br />Chapel Hill may be able to convert from coal to its replacement fuel at a date earlier than May 1, <br />2020. An aspirational target of May 1, 2015 or before is recommended, pending successful test fires <br />and scaling of the alternate fuel regime. <br />Interim Recommendation #2: UNC - Chapel Hill will seek to accelerate conversion from coal to a <br />cleaner fuel or fuel mix. <br />Because the Circulated Fluidized Bed (CFB) boiler in the Cogeneration Plant requires 50% solids to <br />operate as specified, it is possible that some form of biomass (wood pellets or torrefied wood) may <br />be substituted for coal. Yet given the rapid pace of developments in renewable markets, the task <br />force recognizes that UNC- Chapel Hill may move in a different direction in order to meet the <br />primary goal of ending coal use by 2020. Since we wish to ensure that one problematic fuel is not <br />substituted for another, the committee encourages life -cycle analyses to be conducted prior to the <br />adoption of any new fuel source. The goal is to convert from coal to an alternate, cleaner fuel or fuel <br />mix at an earlier date if financially feasible. <br />Interim Recommendation #3: If "biomass" is utilized as the alternate fuel, it will be sourced from <br />certified "sustainably managed" forests, as determined by third party verification. <br />Woody biomass is a potentially large source of renewable energy for UNC - Chapel Hill and the state, <br />but along with opportunity comes a new set of challenges. There are a lot of "undermanaged" <br />forests in NC. Even as UNC- Chapel Hill is considering this source of lower - carbon fuel, moreover, <br />all the state's major electric utilities will likely be considering it as well, in order to meet their legal <br />mandate under the 2007 Renewable and Efficiency Portfolio Standard (REPS) target of 12.5% <br />generation from renewable fuels by 2021. Currently, there is a debate emerging as to the appropriate <br />level of controls on sourcing to ensure that burning wood for energy does not have the unintended <br />consequence of adversely affecting the state's forest resources and wildlife habitat. . <br />Ideally the production of woody biomass for renewable energy could produce a revitalized <br />commercial forest industry in North Carolina, with certified sustainable management practices and <br />attendant benefits in jobs and revenues replacing widespread forestland that is not well managed <br />either for human use or for wildlife. Without appropriate policies to assure this result, however, this <br />increased demand could instead simply create incentives for more rapid and careless deforestation <br />with attendant ecological and aesthetic damage. UNC would need contractual assurances that it <br />source wood only from forests which are certified as "sustainably managed." <br />Energy Task Force Interim Reports 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.