Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-15-2010- 4cc
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Agenda - 06-15-2010 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 06-15-2010- 4cc
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2015 3:05:36 PM
Creation date
6/11/2010 4:22:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/15/2010
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4cc
Document Relationships
Minutes 06-15-2010
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br />Attachment 1 is a packet for a parcel that did belong to an original signer. The original <br />agreement is included along with a new connection agreement. Since an easement is needed, <br />the easement portion of the packet is included. The property owner also owns multiple parcels. <br />Attachment 2 shows the potential expanded service area and the map indexing system <br />used to refer to the individual parcels. Every colored parcel will have a packet created. Some <br />of these parcels are undeveloped and some are not adjacent to a sewer line. Nevertheless, <br />staff believes it is important to begin the dialog regarding sewer service with owners of these <br />parcels and give them an opportunity to be part of this sewer expansion program to leverage <br />the capital project economies of scale. <br />Outreach: County staff is planning on meeting with the public after the packets and <br />concepts therein have been approved in order to distribute the information packets and answer <br />any questions customers may have. After this initial meeting, there would be follow -ups with <br />those who attended the meeting and any packets not distributed at the meeting would be <br />mailed out to the property owners. This series of meetings will serve as a continuation of <br />ongoing effort by County staff to obtain the necessary easements for the sewer line extension <br />and as an opportunity to inform the public about how sewer connection works and what would <br />be involved to connect. (See Attachment 3) <br />Easements: Before construction plans are approved and the project is awarded, <br />Orange County must accept a voluntary dedication, acquire, negotiate or condemn utility <br />easements. <br />Sewer cost efficiencies and incentives: There are efficiencies to be gained by having <br />as many new customers as possible connect to the new system once it is ready for operation. <br />Given the current economic climate and the relatively high costs of sewer connection, staff <br />suggests that incentives be offered to encourage potential customers to sign connection <br />agreements before the system is operational. This will be proposed for discussion by the <br />BOCC in September /October 2010. <br />Some Hillsborough fees have been waived pursuant to the County's 1988 capacity agreement <br />with the Town of Hillsborough and there will be a discussion of further credits if the County's <br />total reserve capacity is modified. <br />Old sewer connection agreement: Approximately 58 of the roughly 100 planned <br />connections in the expansion area (Phase I East and Phase 2) are to parcels for which an <br />agreement was signed in the mid -1980s to connect to sewer once sewer service is available. <br />The "original signers" granted the County sewer easements where needed across their entire <br />property in exchange for a waiver of not only the County's $1,000 per acre and $600 per ERC <br />fees, but also Hillsborough's sewer capital facilities fee (this was paid by the County to <br />Hillsborough in a lump sum at the time). After legal review of these documents by the County <br />Attorney, it was determined that none of the documents had been recorded. Also, many of the <br />individuals who signed the documents in the mid -1980s are deceased and none of the <br />agreements were signed by the County. For these reasons, staff has determined that many of <br />these agreements are no longer valid and new agreements would need to be drawn up, signed <br />by the current owners of the various properties and then recorded. The present scenario is that <br />the terms offered to the original signers would be offered to the current owners of the same <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.