Browse
Search
Minutes - 19841105
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1984
>
Minutes - 19841105
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 1:02:37 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:42:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/5/1984
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' 9 ~~{~ <br />arc'. welfare to have the su'odivision sul~collector street used as a: Direct <br />access to the arterial. <br />voT>=: LJr:ANlrioUS <br />I'.ota.on was made by Commissioner rsarshall, secendec: by <br />Comr,issior_er Lloyd to approve a positive finding on Article 4.2d. <br />VQTE: UIdANII''iOLJ5 <br />notion was Wade by Commissioner Ilarshall, secanc:ed by <br />Commissioner t~ihitted to deny the rezoning recuest because of a negative <br />find ing on Art~~le Q.2c - the c:irect access to an arterial cr collector <br />street. <br />Smith noted that the Planning Boazd recommenc?ations one thrcugh <br />eight address the deniaJ_. <br />Commissioner :~^_arshall noted that recommendations ono through <br />eight cao not ac;dress the fact that John F3reckenridge Drive is going to be. <br />• used as direct access. <br />Commissioner Lloyd pointed out that the Planning ~oarc <br />recommended approval. <br />Chair L•ail.lhoit said he dons not concur ~.+ith the Planning Board's <br />reasoning because the problem c-could es:ist with the traffic going through the <br />c:evelopment fram the high :]ensity that caould be created. at the bacl; or the <br />property. <br />Commissioner I;arshall noted that even if phase four is built, <br />the conditions do not stipulate building Oakdale Drive out to Route 86. <br />VOTE: dyes, 3; P7oes, 2 (Comrissioners Lloyd and t^7alker) <br />2. OCCOP]EPC?IEE POI?~T - SPF~LP.L LJSS PERr9IT - g~n_~a <br />Smith indicated the Planning Eoard reviev:ed this recuest and <br />submits this to tl:e 13aar[. for approval vrith thirteen conditions that address <br />road access and standarc:s, L~ublic water and server facilities and other <br />concerns. <br />Ilotion ~;;+as made by Comr:;issioner tThitted, secondeu by <br />Commissioner rlarshall to approve a positive finding on Articles 1 through <br />17.. <br />VOaE: UPJAIJII-fpLJS <br />?otior. was made by Comrissioner r~4arshall, seconc'ec; by <br />Commissioner t•Thitted to approve a positive findino, on P.rta.cle 2a.3.2a,b,c,d <br />and e. <br />VO^s E : UP7AI?II"OLDS <br />i=otion was made by Commissioner T.~Jhitted, seconded by <br />Commissioner Lloyc'. to approve a *~ositive finding on Article R.2.4a,b and c. <br />VQTE: CJIJP.PJI?1pUS <br />??otinn was mace by Commissioner t•~hitted, seconuec: by <br />Commissioner ?7arshall to approve a positive finding an Article 7.x.1,2 and <br />3. <br />- VOTE : UNANII.90US <br />Lotion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner <br />'•,Talker to approve a positive finding on Article 7.5.2a,b and c. <br />VOTE': UP?l==?•iI?SOUS <br />•?otion was raade by Commissioner T.•7hitted, seconded by <br />Commissioner .'IGrshall to approve a positive findinc on Article 7.15.5,6,7 <br />and 8. - <br />VOTE: UI`AP]I?,OUS <br />rdotior, was made ~y Co,.,missioner rTarshall, secondea by <br />Commissioner i•lhittefi tc approve a negative finding on Article 7.15.9. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.