Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
3~~~ <br />Geoffrey Gledhi7.1, County Attorney, notes the Board is <br />determining taro things: <br />(1) consider whether or not to rezone the *~ronerty and <br />(2) considering tahether or not it meets the special use <br />requirements. <br />Commissioner 'Marshall referred to Article 8.E.9 anr', notes; it <br />does r.ot set the conditions to give access to the site by John Brecl:enridc:e <br />Drive. <br />Smith noted that n9 is related to the site plan. <br />T're 3oard made a *?ositive finding on items 1 through 12. <br />Commissicner !•Iazshall indicated there is still the question of <br />whether or not the L•Tilmore pump station can provide for all the develop:~ent <br />as proposed in that area. <br />The developer indicated he caould negotiate with the Tovrn of <br />Hillsborough. <br />!lotion eras made by Commissioner T?arshall, seconded by <br />Commissioner `•T1litted to approve a negative finning an Article 8.2.4a. <br />VOTE; : U?'dANI!~OUS <br />!•lotion r:as ^:ade ~y Commissioner l~Thitted, seconded by <br />Commissioner ~TarshaJ.l to approve a positive findinc on Article 8.2..~a. <br />VOTT:: UTJAPI2:"iOUS <br />notion was .made by Commissioner ?Thittec~, seconded by <br />Commissioner Marshall to approve a negative finding on Article 8.2.~c. <br />VOTE': i7I?AP1IC20UC <br />!?onion teas made by Commissioner ;Thitted, seconded. by <br />Commissioner ?•-arshall to apprave a positive finding of fact for Frticle a.2a <br />and 4.2b. <br />VOTE : UNl•SP72I20US <br />Commissioner ;•Thittec; referred to Article n.2c and stated that <br />the entire project suitability enc. rezoning request que5t7.On5 if it is <br />appropriate to have a zoning that caill allow multifar^ily use in t,~is <br />location where the traffic from this use woulc' go through a single family <br />community. <br />Chair '7illhoit noted the testimony. was vary persuasive in that <br />the volume of traffic going through a lo:aer density single family <br />residential residential neighborhood would be inappropriate and it should be <br />by a Hare direct access. <br />Plotion was made by Chair T:^?illhoit, seconded by Commissioner <br />!iarshall to approve a negative finding on P_zticle a.2c. <br />VOTE': U?dAA'I?•lOUS <br />Commissioner i•?alker noted this was one of the conditions for <br />approval as recommended by the Planr:ing Board. <br />-. Chair T7illhoit r_oted this is a finding of fact for direct <br />access. <br />Commissioner ?'?al~:er noted it dons have direct access by idC86, <br />however, what is stated is true. <br />Chair CTillhoit pointed out it is a direct access to arterial or <br />collector street; the finding was that it is a subccllector street vrhich is <br />- contrary. <br />Commissioner !?arshall feels the definition has been stretched to <br />qo beyond the public health, safety and ~•relrare. <br />Chair "illhoit noted that it is not conducive to public safety <br />