Minutes - 19841105 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

~ti 4 7 Cor.:rnissioner Lloyd rloved, Commissioner Flarshall secon~.ec the adjournment of this Planning Hearing item to D?ovembor 12th zt 7:30 p.:n. VO'.C'E: UD?AP?I";OU,S E.2 ~,E~.:~~Z'-II~'c= QRn~"?AP1CB--CLA~?O~y~~ Staff presentatien by Collins. This agenc.a item is to receive public comment on a rre??ased text ar:endmer:t for clarification to Article S• 5ectian d.2.27b)1 of the Orange County . 7,oninq. il~p text a.mendnent is needed to clarify to what areas of the _ county the Protected i~72^tershed II (P?^7II) and Plater nuality CriticGl P.rea (?•7701) zoning, districts ap~:ly. The text amendment is as follows: Amend Article 4 Section n.2.27b) 1. ~ctec~~~ T•7ater~heS~T~ (P?•7II) Aistrict of the ozangs County Zoning Ordinance to read: This cistrict vrill be ap*~1iec to the zoned portions of University Lake Cane Creel; and the Upper Eno watershed as designated on the Lane Use Plan. The te~:t amendment would clarify the Ordinance Provisions. Planning Boars member Shan;:lir. notes that vie are protecting just the bottom portion of the Upper Eno vrith this action. Ido restrictions are on the Cec~Gr Grove Township while there are restrictions on Cheeks. ie noted contamination could comp just as easily from up the creel: as dot•rn the creels. This matter urge then referred to the Manning Board for their consideratior, at their t?ove~ber lgth meeting. This conclude: the Public Hearing portion of the Agenc',a. F. ITE'.S FOR ny~.~~-T~y~ 1. ~T~is'~Q•TL*:`- Fn-3-Sa (All Articles belocr are contained in the S~eeial Use Section of the Zoning Ordinance). Susan Smith, Plainer, gave the presentation. A public hearing on the rezoning rec;uest by :yamnton Booms seas held on August 27, 19£?4 vrith continuations on September 18 and October 1, 1984. .Approval of the request would allow far residential development of the site vrith 8 units to the acre. ?'he Planning Board recommends approval of the request subject to 17 conditions. Commissioner =.arshall cuestioned the consistency of the health. safety anc: vrelfare standards and stated that the problems on the specifics seem to make a difference fro:a place to place. There are general statements in the beginning of the Zoning Ordnance for planned cevelonment districts that relate to the general recuirements of health, safety anci welfare. Section 7.1 states: "the :Manned Development districts shall be so re~.ated to the general develop,:ient patterns and the objectives of the com_r_rehensive plan as to provine for the comfort and convenience of residents, facilitate the protectior. of the character of surrounding neighborhoods and reduce automotive traffic congestion." Section 7.x}.3 states: "the site shall be suitable for development in the matter proposed without hazards to persons or property on or off the tract, free from the Probability of flooding, erosion, subsidence or slipping of the soil or other dangers. Canc:ition of soil, ground water level, drainage anc topocraphy shall be appropriate to both the ]cincl and pattern of use intended and lists other specifics to meet all recuirements in carnection therewith as yell as to ~aravide r.eceasary • protection against adverse relationships between uses in i.he district and uses in the surrounding Grpas."