Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
3~4 <br />17. <br />Chair C~Iillhoit noted. there were alternate systems for providing <br />adequate sewacre disposal facilities. <br />T•lotion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner <br />[+?alker to aPprov~ a positive findir:g for Article 7.~.20.3a,b,c,d and e. <br />vo~>a : uriAr-xT•lons <br />• Motion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded bj, <br />Commissioner Lloyd to ap?.~rove a positive finding on'Article 4.2a,b,c,d and e. <br />VOTE: U~'AT'I.lOUS <br />2lotion eras made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner <br />- Marshall to approve a positive finding on P.rticle 7.x.1, 2 and 3. <br />VOTE:- UPTA2IIT1OU~ <br />?_otion was made,by Commissioner iJhitted, seconded by Commissioner <br />Marshall }o apTarove a positive finding on Article 7.15.5,6 and 7.' <br />VOTE: Ur7At7I°1OUS <br />T•lotion was r;ade by Commissioner Marshall, secondeda by <br />Commissioner Whitted to approve negative findings on Articles 7.15.8 and <br />7.15.9. - <br />VOT?; ; UI•'Ar: TT•lOUS <br />Motion was made by Commissioner [9hitted, seconded by Commissioner <br />Lloyd to approve a positive finding on all £ive parts of :`article 7.15.10. <br />VOTE: Ui~APT2?`1OLTS <br />Alotion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Chair C-Tillhoit <br />to approve ar_ositive finding on all six items in Article 7.15.10a. <br />VO'T'E: U?~APiI?-1OLTS <br />'.lotion eras made b,' Commissioner [~7hitted, seconded by Commissioner <br />- tda.rshall to approve a pasitive ;indi_nq on all area dimensions. <br />VOTE: Ur.,Ap'Ir.[OU5 <br />l;otior. was made by Commissioner T~?hitted, seconded by Commissioner <br />tarshall to approve a positive finding on Article C.12. <br />VOTE: UPIANST'QUS <br />Tlotion was mace by Commissioner ~^7hitted, seconded by Commissioner <br />Marshall that since there is no evidence to the contrary to approve the <br />special use application subject to the six conditions as outlined by the <br />Planning Board. <br />VOTE : TJtJA?32MOLT5 <br />Motion was made by Commissioner FThitted, seconded by Commissioner <br />Tarshall to reconsider the motion. <br />VOTE: UFdAC'?'r~OUC <br />"Motion was made by Comrissioner CJhitted, seconded by Commissioner <br />Marshall to approve the xroject as findings in 8.2.2 and subject to the sip: <br />conditions as outlined by the Planning IIoarc except in "2 that the sentence <br />end after the word persons. <br />VOTE: U1dAri2"d0U$ <br />d•~`pq n .'~.~~r'TS _,~$.~SS,~LL?~5~_~F:??T"IT P~('~,,'r1OIJ^- <br />PI]-~ 8 d <br />Collins commented that the Planning Board met on October 23 and <br />recommends approval subject to the 7,S conditions as listed in the a5enc?a <br />abstract. The property is presently zoned CC3. <br />'.'otion was made by Commissioner I~~arshall, seconder by <br />Commissioner [~7hittec: to approve a positive find±ng on Articles II.6 and <br />f~.8.1-12. <br />VO^E; T?1~7Ax'I.TiOUS <br />