Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
3 <? <br />la <br />voTF: vrrAr?I.7OVs <br />I7otian v:as made by Commissioner i7arshall, seconded by <br />- Commissioner T~'hitted to approve a positive finding on Article 7.15.10`1, and <br />2. <br />VOTE: UPIANII7OUS <br />G7otion c•~as mace by Commissioner T~7hitted, seconded by <br />Commissioner r`_arshall to approve a negative finding on Article 7.15.10a3. <br />- VO"A'E: Ui?Ar'I.IOTJS <br />LTotion ~,=as made by Commissioner T,loyd, seconded blr Commissioner <br />-'" AThitted to apnrave a positive findinc or: Art;c12 7.15.10a3a, and b. <br />VOTE : UI'rANII7OUS <br />Lotion vas gads by Commissioner Piarshall, seconc:ec, by <br />Commissioner 'vTY:itted to approve a positive finding for the first tv~o <br />paragraphs of Article 7.15.10a3d and a negative finding on paragraph three <br />conditional u~on future development. <br />VOTE: LTITAI?II~ROUS <br />"lotion 1:=as mace by Commissioner t~Thitteu, SECOndod by <br />Commissioner Lloyc to approve a positive finding on Article 7.7.5.1Ob. <br />VOTE : UIdAr?PIOUS <br />Motion Baas made by Commissioner I•?bitted, seconder: by <br />Commissioner Lloyd to ap^rove a positive finding of Article 5.1.2a and e. <br />VO~`E : UI?l-~LJ7T ~OLT5 <br />TIotion c•~as made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconder by CpmmiSSioner <br />Fiarshall to approve a positive finding of Article 6.2~4a,~a,c. <br />Chair T•?illhoit asked an a point of clarification an 6.?nb aaout <br />the applicFnt being re,~uired to have a detailed landscapinc plan Gnc <br />Commissioner :'?arshall noted that one of the conditions for approval is for <br />the developer to have a detailed landscaping plan. <br />VOTE: Clr1Ar?h1OLTS <br />tlotion v:as made by Commissioner '.7arshall, seconded by <br />• Commissioner T'Thitted to approve a positive finding on Article fi.l2a,c and d. <br />voTE: ulvAr.?Tr,ovs <br />Tlotion teas made by Comr.Tissiener T•7hitted, seconded by <br />Commissioner ?•7arshall to approve a positive finding on Article S.2~d. <br />VpTE : UT_dAPIIP•7OCT5 <br />Fiotior. s•;as made by Comr.,issioner T~hitted, seconded by <br />Commissioner 'Marshall to anprcve a positive finding an Article 6.2~e1, 2,3, <br />and a negative finc:ing on Article 5.24e4. <br />VOTE: UNAr'IrIOTJS <br />Com*;~issioner TThitted Stated -that in the recommendations made by <br />the ]?lapping Boars the sigrage is covered in recommendation n12. <br />Commissioner ITarshall noted that the screening anc? the other <br />negative findings are ta';en care of in recommendation ~9, and that the board <br />needs to act on Artic'_e 8.2.2 of the general findings. <br />I7otion ~-gas mace b=r Commissioner darshall to approve the special <br />use permit for Occoneechee point because there is a preponderance of <br />evidence ~~:Y_ich indicates compliance with the general stanc;ards, specific <br />rules rovernine~ the specific use, and that the use complies v~ith aJ.l <br />recuired re7ulatior,s and standards rnd has not been found, Yn some specific <br />mar_ner, that: <br />(1) the use wzll not promote the public hearing, safety and <br />