Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-15-2010 - 4a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Agenda - 06-15-2010 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 06-15-2010 - 4a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2015 2:01:59 PM
Creation date
6/11/2010 3:47:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/15/2010
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4a
Document Relationships
Minutes 06-15-2010
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br /> 1 approach that will be used every year; therefore, at some point there will need to be a <br /> 2 "correction" when the County will need to identify additional funding to support the current <br /> 3 operating budget. Perhaps, this is a risk that is worth taking at this time with the hope that <br /> 4 revenues will rebound as the economy recovers in future years, but we should acknowledge <br /> 5 that this may be more of a delaying tactic than a solution. Most economists are predicting that <br /> 6 this will be a very slow recovery and that it will take several more years for our state and local <br /> 7 revenues to match those that were generated before the recession began. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 The second concern is the impact this will have on our capital budget. The Manager's <br /> 10 recommendation reduces our capital budget by approximately $1.1 million. This results in our <br /> 11 being able to fund from the pay-as-you-go budget only our technology projects ($1.5 million), <br /> 12 many of which are multi-year commitments, and rental of facilities ($100,000). This projection <br /> 13 is based on the assumption that we will enter into a three-year lease-purchase agreement for <br /> 14 $450,000 worth of computers, which will reduce our upfront costs next year by $300,000. <br /> 15 Altogether, this loss of funding would result in approximately $800,000 worth of CIP school <br /> 16 construction projects being delayed. <br /> 17 <br /> 18 Greater Flexibility on Budgeting of Lottery Revenues <br /> 19 We had budgeted $1.3 million in lottery revenues for the balance of our 2010-2011 Board <br /> 20 approved CIP. The shortfall in the Manager's pay-as-you-go recommendation could be made <br /> 21 up by a relaxation of the County's�policy to budget lottery funds a fully year in arrears. It is ' <br /> 22 estimated that by the end of the 4t quarter (June 30, 2010) we will have accumulated $1.7 �I <br /> 23 million in lottery revenues. If we were allowed to expend all of these funds and revenues from <br /> 24 the first two quarters of the 2010-11 fiscal year once they have been received, we could <br /> 25 complete all of the projects that we had included in our 2010-11 CIP. Basically, we're asking <br /> 26 thaf the Commissioners revise their policy to allow for the budgeting and expenditure of lottery <br /> 27 funds once they are received. <br /> 28 <br /> 29 We should point out that even though we may be able to fund all of the projects in our CIP for <br /> 30 2010-11, these projects come nowhere close to meeting all of our capital needs. Each year we <br /> 31 schedule the highest priority projects for completion, but the bulk of the projects are delayed to <br /> 32 future years or are labeled as "unfunded." In recent years we are falling farther and farther <br /> 33 behind in the maintenance of our facilities and in staying on schedule to construct new schools. <br /> 34 The number of square feet in our facilities and number of acres on our sites have grown <br /> 35 considerably while the projected revenues available for the CIP steadily decreases, in large part <br /> 36 due to the decline in sales tax and the elimination of the state's Public School Building Fund. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Quali�ed School Construction Bonds <br /> 39 We will be applying for Qualified School Construction Bonds (QSCB) to finance the McDougle <br /> 40 Elementary and Middle School roof replacement project. The budget for this project is $3 <br /> 41 million. Only $85,000 is budgeted in 2010-11 for investigatory and design work. Consequently, <br /> 42 receipt of the QSCB will have a minimal effect in 2010-11 but will help us to balance our CIP <br /> 43 projects during the next three years by spreading the cost out over 12-15 years. The first <br /> 44 payment would not be due until 2011-12, which the County Manager has indicated will be <br /> 45 acceptable in terms of the County's debt limit. While our initial application focuses on the <br /> 46 McDougle roof, we anticipate another allocation being made to us similar to last year. We <br /> 47 would apply for other CIP roofing and paving projects in the second round of applications. With <br /> 48 both applications, we intend to apply for approximately $5 million in QSCBs for this year. We <br /> 49 will need the signature of the Chair of the County Commissioners on our application, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.