Browse
Search
Minutes - 19841016
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1984
>
Minutes - 19841016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/14/2008 1:03:02 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:42:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/16/1984
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~$ f ~ <br />5 <br />Commissioner Walker pointed out that with the health hazard that is <br />present, the probJ.em needs to be solved and in this particular case the County <br />may have to subsidize because this is a unicue case. <br />Gommissioner _Iarshall noted there are other health hazards such as <br />Rangewood; the County cannot choose one health hazards over another. She is <br />not willing to subsidize one group of people and no.t subsidize another in the <br />same position; she is not against subsidies provided on an equal basis. She <br />expressed a concern for the figures to be solid enough for the project to be <br />feasible. <br />Commissioner T7hitted pointed out it would take 700 tap ons at 5200.00 <br />to pay bacY. the 5136,000. <br />By consensus the Board directed the County I4anager to meet with the <br />attorney to draw up a contract and bring back a schedule of tap fees and pro- <br />jetted estimates that ~•;oulc be required to make it a viable project. <br />-. Commissioner t•ahitted painted out that it is more reasonable to say <br />that the 5136,000 is a grant and then if development occurs, the revenue will <br />be available for e~:pansion rather than repaying the 5136,000. <br />Ch«ir ~4illhoit feels that based on the data presented from the engi- <br />veer and the County t•Ianager and on the pattern of growth, the growth will be <br />enough to pay the 5136,aa0. <br />~ SUP~~L1Eh=T_P.L_,F~jflILY PLANNIjJG GRAIJ7' <br />tdotion was made by Commissioner Whitted, seconded by Commissioner <br />I4arshall to accept a supplemental State/Federal Family Plannirig grant to be <br />used for medical supplies and an ena-tab open filing system. <br />VOTE: UNAI\I'~IOUS. <br />NOTE: :~TORi+iAN T?ALIiER LEFT THE IfEETING AT 10:30 P.rI. <br />7. SHELT~~~D, T4(~ICSF70P PERFORNAD]CE ~~iREEhIEIdT <br />t4otion was made by Commissioner Tahitted, seconded by Commissioner <br />i•Iarshall to accept the conditions of the Performance Agreement with the Town of <br />Ghapel Hill in exchange for 525,000 to be used for Orange Industries building <br />construction. <br />VOTE: UPTAA:IMOUS. <br />8._ REVSSj,Qr~ Td S~HEDT~LE_ Og $jj~,plljr~,PERI•,T~~'E$S <br />Thompson stated the additional inspection charge would be used by <br />the County to process.. paperwork associated with a stop work order issued for <br />failure to get a building permit. Specifically the charge would be an amount <br />equal to the original fee. His recomraendation is that the following paragraph <br />be incorporated into the fee schedule:, <br />- "t~7ork performed without a permit shall be subject to a late fee <br />equal in amount to the fees specified for the work involved, and <br />in addition thereto. The late fee shall not be construed as a <br />penaty, but as a charge for additional administration expense." <br />(.lotion was made by Commissioner t1'hitted, seconded by Commissioner <br />Piarshall to include the above paragraph in the fee schedule. <br />VOTE: UNANIi~;OUS. <br />9_. _ I~'DS R~;~QRP- PROG~,p,~~~~TIIS__AND_ ~~GAP7IZATION Pr ACE~+".ENT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.