Minutes - 19841001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

~ 1.4 2 Motion was made by Commissioner f•iarshall, seconded by Commissioner GAhitted to approve the June.4 Equalization and Review Alinutes. VOTE: UNANII~:OUS Ilotion. Baas made by Commissioner t•7hitted, seconded by Commissioner I~Zarshall to approve the June 4 Regular I•?eeting minutes as corrected. VOTE: UAIAATIA9OU5 fdotion was made by Commissioner C^~hitted, seconded by Commissioner Alarshall to approve the June 6 Budget minutes. VOTE: UAdANTMOU'S I.lotion was made by Commissioner Gvhitted, seconded by Commissioner Marshall to approve the June 7 Budget minutes. VOTE : UNANIMOUS f•Yotion was made by Commissioner A:arshall, seconded by - Commissioner R*hitted to approve the June I2 Budget minutes. VOTE: Ui'dANIh1OU5 E. PUBLIC F3EARIAIGS (COi'TIT;UED) 1. ,1Q~~~ OAI:S Susan Smith, Planner, gave the presentation. The Participatory Paving Program Project for the 3oppa Oaks Subdivision was presented to receive public comment on the Preliminary Assessment P,esolution and to take action on the adoption of the Final Assessment Resolution and to schedule the public hearing on the Preliminary Assessment Rol]. for October 16, 1984. Ilotian was made by Commissioner Alarshall, seconded by - - Cor.Imissicner G•7hitted to adopt the final Assessment Resolution for ~7oppa Oaks Subdivision, accept the certificate of mailing offered by the Clerk to the Board and to schedule the public hearing on the Preliminary Assessment Roll for October 16, 1984. VbTE: UNANIMOUS 2. Q1?AL~Cxk'~ ~~RS~$d-~IIATHAI~L HALFG•~Y_ HOUS~_ - PD-5-84 Collins made the staff presentation. G~lillhoit indicated that Mayor Nassif would speak to the recommendations of Chapel Hill. Collins noted that staff had received a revised site plan showing all required information. Mayor Nassif was sworn in. Nassif read the September 24, 1984 resolution with the Town Manager's recommendation. He reviewed Chapel Hill's policy of right-of-way dedication and paving noting that the Town had debated this matter but had came to no conclusion on this development on NC $6. He emphasized the Town's intent regarding the appropriateness and _ method of improvement desired. Sumner t•7ynn, applicant, said he had met all the requirements of --. the County and recommendations of the Tovm with the exception of the _ construction of improvements to NC 86. He emphasized that OFC was a law budget, non-profit group and limited financially. He asked that an exception to this recommendation be granted; to make the improvements would cost an amount equal to the cost of furnishing the facility and would essentially "sandbag" the project. i^7hitted asked hoca much the improvements proposed would cost. vdynn responded 56000 to widen with a 6" base and curb/gutter or approximately 5/8 -- 3/4 of the total, furnishing cost. i•Ietion was made by Commissioner G~Thitted to continue the public