Browse
Search
ORD-2007-201 - Planning -Land Use Element Text Amendment – 10-Year Transition Areas 08-21-2007-4u
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 2000-2009
>
2007
>
ORD-2007-201 - Planning -Land Use Element Text Amendment – 10-Year Transition Areas 08-21-2007-4u
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2012 9:48:22 AM
Creation date
6/10/2010 12:48:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/21/2007
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Ordinance
Agenda Item
4u
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
o 7 <br />r. Commission for Women (CFW) Bylaws Amendment u <br />The Board considered reviewing and amending the Commission for Women's Bylaws to <br />include a mission statement, delegation of hiring and supervisory duties, and other minor <br />changes for the purpose of clarification. <br />Laura Blackmon introduced Shoshanna Smith, new Director of the Office of Human <br />Rights and Relations. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that she spoke with Geof Gledhill before the meeting to <br />clarify something on page 6, article 6, section 3, Absentee Votes; also on page 8, article 9, <br />section 6. She asked if this was a common practice and Geof Gledhill had suggested that this <br />be sent back to the County Attorney for clarification. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that she was not familiar with this procedure of voting by <br />proxy of boards and commissions and neither was Geof Gledhill. <br />Geof Gledhill said that his guess is that these by -laws in their original form pre -dated the <br />open meetings requirements for boards and commissions. He said that he will work with the <br />staff on this. <br />The Board deferred action on this item. <br />t. Schools Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (Schools APFO) — Re- approval <br />of Capacity Numbers for Orange County Schools (Elementary Level) <br />The Board considered re- approving the November 15, 2006 capacity numbers at the <br />Elementary level for Orange County Schools. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that she talked with Planning Director Craig Benedict about <br />this. She made reference to page 4 and said that almost all of the calculations have changed, <br />especially noticing the significant decrease in the capacity for Hillsborough Elementary School. <br />The total membership has also decreased from 3,072 to 3,006. She also wanted staff to <br />double check the numbers when the K -3 class size is changed from 23 to 21. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Gordon, seconded by Commissioner Jacobs to <br />approve the revised November 15, 2006 Membership and Capacity numbers as submitted by <br />Orange County Schools on June 29, 2007, and authorize the Chair to sign the form for <br />inclusion into the certified 2007 SAPFOTAC Report, with the provision that staff will double <br />check the numbers when class size is decreased. <br />VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br />u. Land Use Element Text Amendment — 10 -Year Transition Areas <br />The Board considered adoption of text amendments to the Land Use Element regarding <br />10 -Year Transition areas, as presented at the May 21, 2007 Quarterly Public Hearing. <br />Commissioner Gordon said that this is one of the methods to implement the Efland- <br />Mebane Small Area Plan and was passed by a 6 -3 vote by the Planning Board. She said that <br />she has some of the same concerns as the people who voted against it, such as, if the small <br />area plan is defined in the land use element, and that it was such a big fix for the <br />implementation. She asked if there was some other way to implement the small area plan <br />without making this change in the transition area. She said that this is a fundamental change in <br />the way Orange County approaches planning and zoning if there are non - residential uses <br />implemented in the transition area. She suggested consolidating this item into the Quarterly <br />Public Hearing item. <br />Craig Benedict said that several options were examined on how to implement the <br />changes. With a comprehensive plan and a land use plan, there is a very generalized list of <br />definitions. A land use element definition of transition still is a countywide definition, and a <br />change to have non - residential uses in what was typically a residential transition area would <br />only be activated at such time a small area plan is brought forward that is adopted and zoning <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.