Minutes - 19840918 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

3~1 s since 1981 FlOU1G~ require a 20 to 30~ increase to reach market value, while condominiums that e::fisted prior to 1981 would require about a 10b increase.. 2. 3y la~o every property does not have to be visited. Revaluating a particular section and then adjusting the other sections to that sample is being used by other counties but this method will not solve the problems here in Orange County. A horizontal adjustment would create problems also. 3. A three year cycle would provide Orange County the best use of personnel. be the most efficienty and most equitable. Other county tax supervisors do not recommend a four year cycle while a two year cycle would cost more. Kermit Lloyd requested that the Board consider the adoption of 1987 as the effective date for the next revaluation and postpone a decision on the revaluation cycle for further study. Commissioner [calker asked the purpose for having a revaluation. F(ermit Lloyd indicated that in the seventh year, utility property owners have the right to request relief down to the assessment ratio the County is experiencing at that time to correct the inequities that have occurred over the revaluation cycle as some properties have inflated at a greater degree than others. Commissioner Lloyd noted that there are same inequities and would like to see a proper rate adjustment. He expressed concern about the amount of taxes.. This will have a tendency to put the tax burden in proper perspective. Chair [•rillhoit expressed concerns about both the "hat spots" and how they might average out over the eight year cycle and the impact of opening I-40 and vrhether that impact will be felt prior to 1987 or later. He is concerned about the ability of people to deal with the increase in taxes at the time of evaluation and is not against a more frequent evaluation. The system is inequitable to begin with and [•7illhoit would like to have additional retails about the class of the property and the impact on personal property and how the percentages will be adjusted with the values. Notion was made by Commissioner Marshall, seconded by Commissioner [Vhitted to approve an inhouse revaluation effective January 1, 1987 with the revaluation cycle being set after further study. VOTE: Ayes. 4; Noes. 1 ([9illhoit). 3. ,gOLICE SNFORI-1ATION NETWORK P4otion was made by Commissioner [+Talker, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd to approve the renewal of an annual agreement under cahich the County receives access to police information. VOTE: UNANINIpUS 4. ~~~ Q$DE$ ORANGE ~NDU5TRIE~BUILD2NG I•Iotion was made by Commissioner 47hitted, seconded by Commissioner Lloyd for approval of a change order for the-Orange Industries Building that would provide one 10 x 12 canopy instead of three smaller ones. VOTE : Ui~ANIiiOUS 5. APPO~,~T~'I-]EA?T~ Pdotion was mace by Commissioner I.4arshall, seconded by Commissioner :7hitted to approve the appcintment of Anne Brown to the Domiciliary Home Community Advisory Board. VdTF: LTT:ANII•[OU5