Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
~~~ <br />a <br />voT>;: uraArax,.o~s <br />4. PITvEVIET•~ ROP.D AT1A _~RIVE <br />T•Iotion was made by Commissioner Lloyd, seconded by Commissioner <br />T•dhitted to approve the request that Pineview P.oad and Pineview Drive (SItS <br />2042/2043) be paved under the Orange County Participatory Paving Program. <br />VQTE: U_TdAP;ID1OLiS d~ f ~c~ <br />5. ~,pprrln?~ b tv.C. a~uzy~z~sz_~~ .(see file ~ ~ in the <br />permanent files) <br />y Piotion was made by Commissioner ~•lhitted, seconded by Commissioner <br />P•Iarshall to adopt Appendix "D" of the Orange County Builda.ng Ordinance as <br />presented at public hearing on February 27, 1°.'84. <br />VOTE : UFdAr72AI0US <br />6, ARTTC:T•F 2 - ZD~IrTG TERT AI•i':'I~IDT•lE~'' (see file ~ ~~~-/0~ in the <br />permanent files) <br />Motion was made by Commissioner :tiThitted, seconded by Commissioner <br />:-iarshalJ, to approve a rroposed Zoning Ordinance te~:t amendment involving <br />Article 2.3.3.4, advertisement requirements for matters coning before the <br />Orance County Board of Adjustment as presented at public hearing on February <br />27, 1a8~4. <br />VOTE : UrIAT:II.IOUS <br />'7, j~j;~TCT•F, d - °:?OPOSED ZONING DRDZraArTc~ Ti;,~~' ~~~jp~~~ <br />motion was mace by Commissioner harshall, seconded by <br />Commissioner ?~7hitted to approve the Planning Board's recommendation to deny <br />the amendment to P.rticle 4 of she Zoning Ordinance. <br />VOTE: Ur]ANIr2OUS <br />8. r~F,~'~~ELD - y?T~LIt'INARY PLAN <br />:notion was made by Commissioner ~?all:er, seconded by Commissioner <br />FVhitted to approve the Preliminary Plan for Deerfield Subdivision Phase Two. <br />VOTE : UTdF,r; I~~~DUS <br />9. G?2 7~ VALLEY - P$ELIL' xNAfiY_PLA13 <br />Conrissior_er T,~;hitted noted that because of the size of the lots, <br />the usage of this road, and the amount of development in the area, the Class <br />"F" private road as recommended by the Planning Department would not be <br />adequate. There is a mobile home park at the end of this road with seventeen <br />homes. <br />Commissioner :=arshall pointed out that the Board has never <br />approved a class "A" road for this type of.subc'_ivision. <br />Smith pointed out that the planning staff's recommencation was <br />for a state maintained road because of the. lots proposed and the number of <br />mobile homes. The Planning Board was concerned about creating a paved road <br />between two unpaved sections of road and therefore recommended a Class "A" <br />Road. The Developer did decrease the number of lots so he would not be <br />required to pave the road. <br />Comr.:issioner PThitted expressed approval far following state <br />standards as development occurs. <br />Susan Lewis spoke on behalf of Jimmy Freeland who owns the <br />trailer earl: cvho has been maintaining the road. IL developed with a Class <br />"A" Private ~:oad, I4r. Freeland could not be es:pected to lceep it up and the <br />road would deteriorate. Once the subdivision is built, 30 families will be <br />using the road. Clearly, there are more than ten lots when you count the <br />mobile homes at the end of she road. Lewis pointed out that the subdivision <br />or:'inance a~.loc~is private roads to preserve natural areas through special <br />