Browse
Search
Minutes - 19840529
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
1980's
>
1984
>
Minutes - 19840529
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/5/2013 2:50:42 PM
Creation date
8/13/2008 12:41:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/29/1984
Document Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
"l~•~ <br />a <br />Dr. Stanley Bennett, from the audience, asked if this plan was <br />proceeding under any State authorization. Collins responded there is <br />statutatory authority to proceed in the manner being proposed. <br />w.A. 5cott inquired of Collins the location of the dividing line <br />between Chapel Hi11 and Carrboro in relation to the railroad tracks. Collins <br />pointed on the map that the dividing line follows Rogers Road. Scott inquired <br />further who decided that this was the dividing line between Chapel Hill and <br />Carrboro. Collins responded that he understood that discussions were held <br />within the Chapel Hill Town Council and Tovrn of Carrboro representatives as to <br />where the dividing line should be and this was an agreed upon line. Scott <br />asked why there had not been a public hearing about the line and Collins, as <br />well as Commissioner Chair Willhoit, responded that this was_ the public <br />hearing. The dividing line itself is part of what is under consideration. <br />Scott wished to go on record as being opposed to the dividing line following <br />Rogers Road. He felt that the railroad, at least from Homestead Road to <br />Eubanks Road should be the dividing line between Chapel Hill and Carrboro. <br />Chair willhoit responded that the Chapel Hill High School area is west of the <br />railroad- tracks and it is already part of the town limits of Chapel Hill. <br />Also, Carrboro has requested a modification of the joint planning line. <br />Jim Porto, Mayor of Carrboro, spoke on the following items <br />concerning joint planning: <br />(1) Dividing line - Carrboro feels that the railroad should <br />be used for the dividing line as originally set out. <br />(2) Standards - should not be an issue. <br />(3) Zoning -- Joint approval an zoning and an agreement on the <br />zoning map is the most important aspect. <br />(4) Procedures - the administrative procedures to approve <br />permits seem cumbersome. Better administrative measures° <br />are needed. <br />Cammissioner Chair 47i11hait wanted to clarify his understanding from <br />a meeting with Carrboro approximately two weeks previously. He noted that <br />essentially they seemed in agreement with the red line dividing the area that <br />put the high school and city dump in Chapel Hill's jurisdiction. The line <br />would go up to the rural buffer area, proceed eastward to the railroad tracks <br />and follow the railroad tracks through the rural buffer. He understood that <br />Carrboro was in agreement with the men and Twenty Xear transition areas but <br />wished to have the line moved to the railroad tracks in the rural buffer area. <br />Assistant Town Manager Sonna Loewenthal read the Resolution adopted <br />by the Council of the Town of Chapel Hill on April 24, 1984. (See Pile # <br />in the Clerk's permanent file for a copy of the resolution.) <br />Dr. Stanley Bennett, a resident of Chapel Hi11 Township in the rural <br />buffer area, urged the County and the two Towns to come to a reasonable and <br />acceptable agreement on the issue of zoning. The residents are dependent for <br />their property values and general welfare on sound and firm planning and <br />zoning practices. Zoning is exceedingly important. <br />Planning Board member Kizer inquired of Mayor Porto if the issue of <br />contributing to the cost of implementation and enforcement had come up in any <br />of the discussions. Mayor Porto responded that it had not come up. Kizer <br />inquired if they had any idea how many extra meetings would be generated by <br />following the request for meetings to streamline the planning arrangements. <br />Mayor Porto explained his understanding of the procedures and noted that he <br />did not know the number of meetings but that with so many boards and <br />rnmmi~cinnc lnnkina ah aar_h nlan. it seemed there Woula be many meetings. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.