Minutes - 19840417 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

~"7~ (2) cost per home to canrect to the sewer line - a letter has been prepared to solicit bids for the connection of all homes to the sewer line; (3) e::tent of septic failure in the project area -- various surveys show that from 40-$5~. depending on the specific area, and (4) impact cf deleting interes4 income from annual operating revenue projections - the interest income has been deleted from the annual operating revenue projections. Commissioner Y?bitted noted that the rate Hillsborough will charge still needs to be determined. Chairman G•aillhoit will contact the town of Hillsborough for a meeting. There was a consensus of the Board that bids fox the connection of all homes to the sewer line will be solicited but a survey would not be i conducted. 17 . P13.~~~EQZ~_F.~~P~~~~J~8~~~9IT,.._DF ZONING . PL?91~Q~~.~.r-~Ti CHEEKS_ _~~GINSH~P Thompson presented the three alternatives for receiving addi- tional public input on the proposed extension of zoning of Cheeks Township and the G~Tater Quality Critical Area standards: 1. Direct the Planning Board to reconsider zoning proposals for Cheeks Towr+_ship for recor:rnennation to the Board of Conuaissioners. 2. Direct the Planning Board to reconsider the Cheeks Township Advisory Council recommendations before reporting back its recommendations again to the Board of Corsrissioners. 3. Create a special Ad Hoc Study Committee, composed of membershp proposed by Lindsey Efland at the April 5, 1984 meeting, ~+ith the attached charge to consider zoning proposals for Cheeks Township• including water quality critical area proposals as applied to Cheeks and all designated, existing or proposed water supply watersheds in Orange County and to make recommendations to the Planning Board. The Planning Board would in turn report its recommendations to the Board of Commissioners after considering the advice and recommendations of the Ad HOC Committee. Chairman Gvillhoit suggested accepting Alternative 1 and requested that the Planning Board consider the question. o~ citizen input and consider hove the process should involve the township advisory board or any other group and also that the Planning Board involve the Econonic Development Commission to review this proposal. Commissioner Lloyd indicated Alternative 3 as the most logical; to have an ad hoc committee make the recommendation to the Planning Board. He further recuested to have his name and Carl G~7alters' name deleted from the proposal and two other names substituted. Commissioner G-?hitted noted that a process is set up and it would do harm to set up another process outside of the Planning Board. Alice Gordon, Chair of the Planning Board, supported Alternative 1 as states; by Chairman t°;illhoit. F•Iotion was made biT Commissioner Y?alker, seconded by Commis- sioner Lloyd to accept Alternative 3. A substitute motion was rtiade by Chairman U?illhoit, seconded by Corunissioner Marshall to approve referring to the Planning Board and requesting them to review that recommendation and consider appointing a citizen group to meet v:ith them far discussion and also meet with the Economic Development Commission. VpTT17G ON THE 1.5OTT(1N Tn cTTF{G'i'TTTiTF.e AVp<;, 3. Nna~. 2 (y~alkAf apc7 L,invn)