Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-03-2010 - 2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
Agenda - 06-03-2010 - Budget Work Session
>
Agenda - 06-03-2010 - 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2015 11:50:55 AM
Creation date
6/7/2010 9:52:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/2010
Meeting Type
Budget Sessions
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
2
Document Relationships
Minutes 06-03-2010
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1r <br />u <br />61 <br />Both DSS and CCSA work to support families. With the dual system in Orange County, there are <br />inherent challenges that are not always conducive to cost effectiveness nor efficiency in service <br />delivery to our citizens. Salaries and administration are relatively high and this nonprofit is <br />dependent on government funding. Given that information and referral is available elsewhere, <br />any county funds available would be better spent paying subsidy for children who are waiting for <br />child care. <br />Dispute Settlement Center $16,660.00 $20,407.00 $16,000.00 <br />84 <br />This program appears effective and DSS actually has contracts for services with it and may need <br />to use it more if some staff positions are not filled. A consolidated contract for all services may be <br />beneficial. <br />Inter -Faith Council for Social Service <br />$36,480.00 $56,480.00 $36,000.00 <br />81.5 <br />Salaries for all staff do not appear to warrant an increase at this time. Residential programs <br />appear to serve other counties also and these counties do not contribute to the costs. There <br />needs to be better coordination with local agencies about families being moved into Orange <br />County and to assure that all food participants receive federal assistance if they are eligible. <br />Joint Orange Chatham Community Action $80,000.00 $80,000.00 $60,000.00 <br />(JOCCA) <br />64 <br />It is unclear who receives emergency assistance and how that is coordinated with other programs <br />to avoid duplication. Orange County funds are being used to support costs in another county and <br />that county has been reducing its support. These funds should be reduced or eliminated since <br />they are for administrative costs only. <br />OE Enterprises, Inc. $45,199.00 $52,175.00 $45,100.00 <br />86 <br />This is an effective program working with persons with disabilities. Although there may be a need <br />for salary increases for staff, this may not be the year for the county to pay those increases. <br />Orange Chatham Alternative Sentencing $70,550.00 $105,000.00 $70,000.00 <br />78 <br />This may be more expensive as a stand -alone nonprofit than if it was with an agency since <br />• administrative costs are high. Is an effective program as it now stands but its expansion appears <br />to duplicate services provided by other agencies in the community. <br />Thursday, May 27, 2010 Page 11 of 12 <br />2009 -10 <br />2010 -11 <br />2010 -11 <br />• Evaluator Scorecard Results and Evaluator Comments <br />Approved <br />Request <br />Manager <br />Rec. <br />Evaluator: Social Services (Social Services Board) <br />Chapel Hill - Carrboro YMCA Boomerang <br />$0.00 <br />$5,000.00 <br />$0.00 <br />62 <br />Addresses a true need in the community and appears effective. Does not serve children from <br />both school systems. <br />Child Care Services Association <br />$36,571.00 <br />$40,675.00 <br />$0.00 <br />1r <br />u <br />61 <br />Both DSS and CCSA work to support families. With the dual system in Orange County, there are <br />inherent challenges that are not always conducive to cost effectiveness nor efficiency in service <br />delivery to our citizens. Salaries and administration are relatively high and this nonprofit is <br />dependent on government funding. Given that information and referral is available elsewhere, <br />any county funds available would be better spent paying subsidy for children who are waiting for <br />child care. <br />Dispute Settlement Center $16,660.00 $20,407.00 $16,000.00 <br />84 <br />This program appears effective and DSS actually has contracts for services with it and may need <br />to use it more if some staff positions are not filled. A consolidated contract for all services may be <br />beneficial. <br />Inter -Faith Council for Social Service <br />$36,480.00 $56,480.00 $36,000.00 <br />81.5 <br />Salaries for all staff do not appear to warrant an increase at this time. Residential programs <br />appear to serve other counties also and these counties do not contribute to the costs. There <br />needs to be better coordination with local agencies about families being moved into Orange <br />County and to assure that all food participants receive federal assistance if they are eligible. <br />Joint Orange Chatham Community Action $80,000.00 $80,000.00 $60,000.00 <br />(JOCCA) <br />64 <br />It is unclear who receives emergency assistance and how that is coordinated with other programs <br />to avoid duplication. Orange County funds are being used to support costs in another county and <br />that county has been reducing its support. These funds should be reduced or eliminated since <br />they are for administrative costs only. <br />OE Enterprises, Inc. $45,199.00 $52,175.00 $45,100.00 <br />86 <br />This is an effective program working with persons with disabilities. Although there may be a need <br />for salary increases for staff, this may not be the year for the county to pay those increases. <br />Orange Chatham Alternative Sentencing $70,550.00 $105,000.00 $70,000.00 <br />78 <br />This may be more expensive as a stand -alone nonprofit than if it was with an agency since <br />• administrative costs are high. Is an effective program as it now stands but its expansion appears <br />to duplicate services provided by other agencies in the community. <br />Thursday, May 27, 2010 Page 11 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.